New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do advantages outweigh disadvantages?
The issue of introducing new technology is one that has been debated increasingly over the past few years. At this point, some claim that the new technology is advantageous and gives various and interesting experiences for children compared to the past while there are others who are negative. This essay will now examine both sides of the argument and end at a personal approach.
New technologies offer great advantages. To be precise, children are able to enjoy new technology through devices and games. For example, watching videos, playing games and using a smart phone. Due to that, most children spend their time indoors rather than outdoors and it holds that in between them. So, although they do not meet each other, they can play and have fun online. Moreover, they can make friends through it.
Next, new technology can save the aspect of cost. other activities or enjoying free time outside can accrue costs. Also, new technology can replace other activities. For instance, VR is an imaginary experience. So, it is useful because they don’t need go out and buy anything. They can do all of the things just by only watching and moving through the VR.
However, we should not overlook drawbacks as well. Firstly, they can lose time with their parents. Children are fascinated by more developed technologies. Therefore, they may think more narrowly about their free time, and they might just prefer only electronic devices.
Finally, they will be able to dangerous spending their free time only using the devices.
To conclude, there are both advantages and disadvantages of this issue. However, from my perspective, continually developing technologies can have both in equal measure.
- In recent years, the structure of a family and the roles of its members are gradually changing. What kinds of changes can occur? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 61
- In recent years, the structure of a family and the roles of its members are gradually changing. What kinds of changes can occur? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 11
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- In recent years, the structure of a family and the roles of its members are gradually changing. What kinds of changes can occur? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Other
...technology can save the aspect of cost. other activities or enjoying free time outsid...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 295, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ed go out and buy anything. They can do all of the things just by only watching and moving...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20216606498 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69931349014 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628158844765 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4625658539 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.5 106.682146367 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.5909090909 20.7667163134 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302157477618 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810241999834 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581896684297 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1520897415 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323373178121 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 50.2224549098 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.99 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.