New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Today, society is gradually modernizing, and along with it is the appearance of technological gadgets, especially smartphones and computers. Then, it has changed the way children spend their free time. Despite some obvious harms of this trend, I believe that these are outweighed by the benefits.
On the one hand, technological devices may help children to broaden their horizons with valuable knowledge. With the help of smartphones, children can study anywhere, in any subject, or look up any information they want instantly. In addition, it also can relieve their stress after school. For example, they can use smartphones to listen to their favorite pieces of music, read online novels or watch films, etc. And especially, they can make friends and communicate with foreign friends.
On the other hand, spending a lot of time on technology can be harmful to children. Firstly, they can easily get diseases such as back pain, eyestrain, etc. For instance, children spending hours sitting in front of the computer screen without going out to exercise will make the eyes not rest, and the body stagnates. Secondly, because the children are too young to be able to control themselves, they may think negatively due to inappropriate information, which makes their relationships worse, less confident when standing in front of people, and there may be unfortunate cases due to online imitations. Finally, many children waste a lot of time playing video games instead of paying attention to their studies. That is the reason why they often receive poor grades at school.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that technology has made children great in many ways. However, many problems will arise if children are not controlled when using technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-23 | Ahmad_off | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-17 | MEBC Class | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-03 | BuiGiaHan | 89 | view |
| 2024-03-19 | phuong cao | 84 | view |
| 2023-12-25 | hau le | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25357142857 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83455130884 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635714285714 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.1862744959 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9375 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244013435447 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887740332973 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115464242971 0.0667982634062 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15938938404 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944591428648 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.