now a days more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face it is a positive or a negative development

In recent years, there has been considerable debate about how technology help connect with far away friends and relative. Nowadays, more and more people will build relationship bridges on social media. In my opinion, this is a negative development.
Undeniably, the convenience, save time and increase efficiency by online socialization is the greatest appeal. For example, in the period of COVID-19, many cities were lockdowns and everybody should stay at home. Then, socializing online provides access to staying connected with families or friends. Therefore, the virtual social has probably changed some people felt better when they stay at home. However, this does not necessarily imply that face to face social can be replaced by the internet.
In fact, a coin has two sides, cyber social also have some disadvantages. The first serious problem arising from socializing online is internet fraud. Many people are possessing fake identities to take people's personal information. For instance, some impostors might disguised as a friends or poor guys to cheat people’s money. Scammers will cut off contact with you forever, when they get money.
Second, personal information leakage also is a serious problem. For example, many young girls open access to their personal photos for some online. Then, some scammers might photoshop their pictures, thereby blackmailing them or posting those photos on the internet.
In conclusion, although it has become more popular for the public to socialize through the internet, it has brought about too many problems for this to be considered a positive trend.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...g online is internet fraud. Many people are possessing fake identities to take peoples persona...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a friend' or simply 'friends'?
Suggestion: a friend; friends
...ance, some impostors might disguised as a friends or poor guys to cheat people’s money. S...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.424 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76520089686 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.656 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5575211888 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.7647058824 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7058823529 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196970123014 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605844066465 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059601657476 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100228483317 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597560151826 0.056905535591 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.56 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.