Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Recent decades have witnessed an increase in animal experiments, raising many questions of animal rights. Although the proposal of its positive impacts on humankind appears reasonable, I advocate its prohibition due to the animals’ sufferings ensued.
On the one hand, it is apparent that animal experimentation is morally wrong. Many species are injected lethal viruses into the body to testify the effectiveness of the medicines. This suggests a causal relationship with animals’ pains and physical injuries, leading to their instant mortalities. For instance, thousands of bats have to suffer from many side effects such as brain injuries, loss of consciousness when being involved in Ebola vaccine trials, causing a global outcry for animal right violations.
On the other hand, animal experiments are not without humanity-related advantages. First, Many medicines would be thoroughly scrutinized before market distribution as their effectiveness has been researched from animal experiments. This would culminate in a reduction in the potential health risks in users and eradicate their diseases. In addition, Animal experimentation would minimize the possibilities of human participation in drug trials, thereby decreasing health hazards. In fact, many destitute individuals are susceptible to modified genetic sequencing after their clinical trials for money earnings, which feed into the emergence of even more serious conditions especially cancers and permanent paralysis in the long term.
In conclusion, I believe that it is animal rights ignorance when it comes to animal experimentation. Subsequently, Official authorities and laboratory scientists should undertake more progressive and practical alternative experimenting methods to combat this hot-debated issue.
- Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be givenmore privacy, or is the price of their fame an invastion into their privatelife? 78
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Although it is a freedom to use tobacco while some people think it should be made illegal as the same way as other drugs. To what extent do you agree or disagree？ What’s your opinion? 56
- Some people believe that it is a good idea to continue to work at their old age Do you agree or disagree 89
- It is believed that people who read a lot of novels have developed better imagination and language skills than people who prefer to watch TV To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ermanent paralysis in the long term. In conclusion, I believe that it is animal...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.10671936759 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36591377735 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675889328063 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1492447158 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.846153846 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204534011667 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760614021918 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061004138012 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118979697633 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00632090335328 0.056905535591 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.16 12.4159519038 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.