Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of th

Essay topics:

Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Regarding the growth in popularity of medical research that entails animal testing, opinions differ as to whether such a practice should be sustained or not. I am of the opinion that animal testing is morally injustifiable and attach importance to the development of alternative methods.
On the one hand, animal testing is undoubtedly a highly effective method of medicinal test. As animals namely rats and apes display a broad range of genetic traits similar to human’s, they are widely employed to investigate treatments for human diseases. To specify, if any undesirable side effects are observed, alterations will be made to the medicine, thereby lowering the risk of medical complication in human. Vaccines, for example, require countless trial on animals before being officially introduced and applied to the masses.
On the other hand, animals are human’s fellow living creatures that deserve respect as well. As a matter of fact, drug testing procedures have caused intense sufferings for numerous animals. To illustrate, unsuccessful trials may culminate in their malfuntion, disability, impairment and mortality. Everyone aware of the fact that the pharmaceutical products they are using are the byproducts of animal torture may feel a level of guilt. Furthermore, non-animal testing, including the replication of human tissues and cells with the assistance of advanced computer-modeling techniques, has been examined by prominent scientists with successful outcomes. Therefore, the exploitation of animal can be gradually eradicated.
In conclusion, animal testing is against moral values and more effective alternatives should be developed in the interest of not only human’s health but also animals’.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-21 ci6u0w 67 view
2024-01-21 ci6u0w 89 view
2023-08-06 thlinh 61 view
2023-07-22 ThHuong 61 view
2022-12-10 congnguyen05x204 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 101, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...entails animal testing, opinions differ as to whether such a practice should be sustained or ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 77, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to respect'
Suggestion: to respect
...’s fellow living creatures that deserve respect as well. As a matter of fact, drug test...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73151750973 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16763542965 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665369649805 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5423523976 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.307692308 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258794437238 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912041946431 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542141252658 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163242362313 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277237908803 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.