Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.
There is a growing trend that animals are treated as parts of the development of new medicines to testify to their safety. Opinions are divided as to whether these experiments should still be encouraged in terms of benefits to society or they are worth banning due to the lack of morality. This essay will elaborate on both these points of view and argue in favour of the latter one.
On the one hand, animal experiments prove to be much safer especially when it is compared with those on humans. Considering the fact that medicines are developed on a daily basis in order to handle/address the massive growth of new diseases and illnesses, human experiments seem too dangerous and risky to put the lives of those on the edge of death. As a matter of fact, animals are regarded as contributions to the invention of newly-efficacious medicines, which is totally unharmful in the aspect of humans’ safety and does not force unwilling individuals to take part in these cruel processes. The invention of COVID 19 Vaccines is a perfect illustration of this case. Scientists in the USA have successfully experimented these on chimpanzees and monkeys so as to ensure the utmost effect without any harm to those getting vaccinated later. Subsequently, animal experiments have already played such an indispensable role in combating the most serious pandemic of this decade.
On the other hand, I will challenge the aforementioned school of thought since I believe the disadvantages emanating from this development are far more significant. First and foremost, lives of humans and animals deserve to be treated equally in the same measure. Undoubtedly, animals are creatures which have feelings and emotions as they have no obligation to enter such a cruel process to invent something that only benefits the human being. Many kinds of animals such as dogs and cats are considered to be not only friends but also, in some cases, valuable members which hold important positions in the family setting. Additionally, to achieve one goal in the medicine industry, I suppose humans have to sacrifice a huge number of innocent animals, some of which are on the verge of extinction and this somehow has devastating effects on the environment or the biodiversity. The supporters of animals have their right to prevent animals from being killed and abused without justifiable reasons as there are still some ways to test the effect of new medicines thanks to the advancement of technology and computerized analyses.
In conclusion, while animal experiments have been truly beneficial to human beings as they are solutions to ramifications of some severe diseases, I am more convinced that humans should stop using animals as the tool to invent medicines due to their precious lives and the possibility of new experiments technology can bring to us.
- Research into new types of medicine and treatments are essential for improving health and dealing with diseases Who do you think should fund these researches private companies individuals or governments 80
- IELTS WRITING TASK 2 Task 2 It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaur dodo There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- Research into new types of medicine and treatments are essential for improving health and dealing with diseases Who do you think should fund these researches private companies individuals or governments
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of th 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...y to their safety. Opinions are divided as to whether these experiments should still be encou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and argue in favour of the latter one. On the one hand, animal experiments prov...
^^^^
Line 2, column 760, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...mented these on chimpanzees and monkeys so as to ensure the utmost effect without any ha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mic of this decade. On the other hand, I will challenge the aforementioned scho...
^^
Line 3, column 1132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f technology and computerized analyses. In conclusion, while animal experiments ...
^^^
Line 4, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...experiments technology can bring to us.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, while, as to, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 41.998997996 190% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2370.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 466.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08583690987 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99921397969 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530042918455 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 781.2 506.74238477 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.513684579 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.125 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.125 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312218986001 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946259828661 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554700523936 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200815629818 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291266332517 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.