IELTS WRITING TASK 2
Task 2: It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaur, dodo…) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Opinions are divided as to whether the extinction of several animal species is inevitable or it could be otherwise hampered and stopped by humans’ endeavors. While I am convinced that the former point of view is reasonable, I also believe in the latter one as my essay will elaborate on both.
On the one hand, it is undoubted that some animals starting to disappear from the Earth were just part of a natural process as it is virtually impossible to bring a halt to their destruction. A perfect illustration of this point can be inferred from the dinosaur. The extinction commenced such a long time ago as meteors crashed our planet and completely eradicated all relevant species at that time. From my perspective, humans could do nothing to change the disastrous result; however, this led to the domination of human beings in the contemporary world. Therefore, we are the ones who benefit directly from this such catastrophe and I assume we have no reason to affect decisions from the nature itself. To add further credence to my assertion, it is common to have some old species replaced by new kinds of animals as the natural evolution is endless.
On the other hand, my viewpoint is that humans should make strenuous efforts in order to discontinue or at least delay the devastating process. As far as I am concerned, bio-diversity is something which deserves our consideration. By protecting these kinds of endangered species, we do make attempts and endeavors to flourish our environment as the number of animals remains unchanged, which certainly does not bring imbalance to wild habitats. For example, Indonesia has been well-known for its celebrated safari which is regarded as the best place to bring utmost security to animals on the verge of extinction such as the white tiger, the rhino, etc. From my perception, scientist and environmentalists of this nation acknowledge huge benefits accruing from this reservation as these animals prove valuable to scientific researches and the stability of bio-diversity as well as the eco-system.
In conclusion, this still remains a controversial topic. While I hold my viewpoint that the natural extinction is nearly unfeasible to manage, I am still convinced that we as humans do play an integral part in protection and therefore have an obligation to keep the intact nature of the animal world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-27 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-12 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | Kien Vu | 84 | view |
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of th 73
- Research into new types of medicine and treatments are essential for improving health and dealing with diseases Who do you think should fund these researches private companies individuals or governments
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaur dodo There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- IELTS WRITING TASK 2 Task 2 It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaur dodo There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Research into new types of medicine and treatments are essential for improving health and dealing with diseases Who do you think should fund these researches private companies individuals or governments 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Opinions are divided as to whether the extinction of several animal specie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the intact nature of the animal world.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, while, as to, at least, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0616966581 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03846036573 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547557840617 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.0401873382 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.266666667 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9333333333 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199826180853 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635242422775 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344369446899 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111449105236 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489657397643 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.