It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaur, dodo…) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
For some people, extinction is regarded as a natural progression in the development of fauna; thus there is no need for humans to deter this from occurring in real life. From my perspective, I genuinely disagree with this assumption. Analyzing the benefits of endangered animal species in terms of material for scientific researches and production would provide valid support for my verdict.
Initially, it is tangible that, for years, scientists have utilized and taken inspiration for new inventions from animals on the verge of extinction. Take, Jonathan the Tortoise, as an illustration, which is the oldest living creature still existing on Earth. It originated from an extinct branch of an ancient tortoise; therefore there are various precious ADN in its body which is valuable for scientific research, for instance how to improve people’s longevity. Consequently, channeling effort into preserving these endangered animal species can contribute to advantageous experimental results for humans’ life. As most individuals can take advantage of these findings, protecting fauna on the verge of extinction should be responsible for humans.
The other justification behind the need to protect endangered fauna refers to the fact that they are indispensable materials for certain sectors of manufacturing. For example, Parada, a fashion brand that is well-known for luxurious coats made of fox fur, has made millions of dollars because these coats are extremely convenient, light, yet still warm. Tangibly, protecting and consciously moderating exploiting these on-the-brink-of-extinction foxes would be beneficial not only for the corporation but also for the sake of customers. Thus, this makes it clear that human beings must take action against the extinction of animal species for benefiting themselves.
In conclusion, as for the aforementioned explanations of endangered animal species being scientific and manufacturing materials, I hold a strong belief that people should be in charge of the extinction of these species. From now on, human beings should put more strict laws into practice and eliminate lenient regulations in terms of protecting fauna on the brick of extinction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-27 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-12 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | Kien Vu | 84 | view |
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 84
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income Unfortunately tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not well managed What are the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the modern world Do you think that the benefit 84
- People in many countries are spending less time with their families What are the reasons and effects of this 78
- Some people think hard work and determination are the keys to success in life Some on the other hand think that there are other factors behind a successful life Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66465256798 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31516453545 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601208459215 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4200734098 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.928571429 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23036570461 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089080899471 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485020263833 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155777163295 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404510560777 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.