It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaur, dodo…) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People have different views about whether or not extinction of animal species is a natural phenomenon, and preventing this process is pointless. From my perspective, I am completely against this notion for a number of reasons.
First of all, humans are partly responsible for various disappearances of animal species. While many wild beasts went extinct from natural causes, a greater proportion of species are on the verge of extinction or no longer extant as a result of human activities. Mass deforestation to build infrastructure or for timber harvesting has cost wild animals their living habitats, leading to food sources depletion and eventually, death. To illustrate, Australia's recent wildfires have pushed around 100 species closer to extinction. Hunting is another notorious cause for the dwindling of animals’ population as many species such as rhinos or elephants are hunted for their body parts. For example, the African Black Rhinos are no longer in existence for being hunted for their horns.
Another point is that preventing animals from being extinct is critical to our ecosystem. The loss of animal species could disrupt our ecosystem’s balance. Since all living organisms’ lives in a habitat are interrelated, once a species succumbs to extinction, other animals that depend on it will be affected and eventually disappear. This will lead to the lack of diversity and can also cause potential damage to our economy. For example, in 2013, the sunflower starfish in Northern California declined in number due to a disease, thus causing its prey - the purple sea urchins to flourish. This sudden proliferation has damaged the red urchins’ population and also exhausted a great source of sushi, which resulted in a slump in the area’s economy.
To summarize, the process of animal extinction has been escalated by human activities such as hunting and deforestation. This will have grave consequences on both our ecosystem and our economics, thus it is urgent that we take action to protect all animal species.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-27 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-12 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | Kien Vu | 84 | view |
- If a product is good and meets customer needs then people will buy it and advertising is unnecessary To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in our everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 78
- Many people have suggested that young adults should undertake a period of unpaid work helping people in their local community What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 67
- Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money making attractions aimed at tourists Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions Discuss on both sides and give your opinion 73
- Some businesses find that new employees who just finished their education lack basic interpersonal ability such as working with other employees as a team What do you think are the causes and what solutions can you suggest 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
People have different views about whether or not extinction of animal species is a natur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, thus, while, for example, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33126934985 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98297639081 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585139318885 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3059562939 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.625 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247688947914 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855544470264 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061210475099 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164303626746 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671803109833 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.