Building the habit of recycling is one of the recommended practices for everyone living in today’s societies. However, many wonder whether schools or parents should be the ones mainly responsible for developing this practice. Although I think both can contribute to this, schools should play a more vital role.
However, that is not to say that parents should not be involved in teaching children to recycle. Firstly, children usually mimic their parents’ behaviors, both good and bad ones. As a result, if parents do not promote this habit by regularly practicing it, children will see that they do not need to do so. Secondly, because the process of recycling products mostly takes place in a domestic environment, parents should teach their children how to recycle and reuse in their homes. For example, parents can start by recycling groceries packaging, like oil bottles, plastic bags, or egg cartons.
Nevertheless, I believe that schools play a more crucial role in educating children on recycling. Firstly, schools are more open-minded and environmentally-conscious environment. For example, many parents from older generations do not believe in recycling and think of it as a waste of time. As a result, schools should provide children with a thorough analysis of why recycling is critical and the best ways to recycle. Secondly, children also develop habits through peer pressure, which is an element prevalent in schools. For example, when seeing that other students are recycling, children will be motivated to do so, regardless of their beliefs.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that families play a significant role in educating children on recycling. However, I believe that schools remain the most important source of both information and motivation for children to develop a habit of recycling.
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is this the case Is it a positive or negative development 73
- Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries Why is this the case Is it a positive development 78
- At many companies today applicants are often rejected due to old age Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 78
- Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries Why is this the case Is it a positive development 84
- Most agree that schools should be training children to recycle waste to preserve the Earth s natural resources However some believe that it is parents who should teach their children to recycle waste while others feel schools are more responsible Discuss 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun wonder seems to be countable; consider using: 'many wonders'.
Suggestion: many wonders
...e living in today’s societies. However, many wonder whether schools or parents should be th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... schools should play a more vital role. However, that is not to say that parents...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 652, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to do so, regardless of their beliefs. In conclusion, it is undeniable that fam...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35888501742 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08426733966 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536585365854 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.5205196318 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.125 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376400356704 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127714139682 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067592156815 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227949537898 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680510642275 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.