Governments should make people responsible for looking after their own local environment. Do you agree or disagree?
Whether people should be held responsible for their own local environment protection by the government has become a topic of discussion. From my point of view, I firmly support this idea for a number of reasons.
First, because human self-discipline is often unreliable, suitable punishments from the government are necessary. To be more specific, if people are left to protect the environment of their own volition, efforts may vary between different communities since having an equal understanding of our habitat’s importance throughout the community is impossible. For example, all tourist attractions nowadays have to impose a fine on those who litter, because once such a rule is not in effect, all sites will be filled with trash left behind by ignorant tourists. In Ha Long Bay, Vietnam, due to a lack of guards, the world-renowned heritage site is blighted with trash floating on the water surface.
Another point is that, through educational efforts, governments holding people accountable for their actions in the local environment can help raise awareness effectively. Most people nowadays have a fear of missing out so once a green lifestyle is advocated strongly, it will soon spread widely. Take the inox straw trend for example, the movement started by a group of environmentalists was picked up by large beverage companies and has now become one of the most profitable businesses the world over. The same effect may not be achieved if the movement was a policy implemented by the government. Furthermore, initiatives can be taken to prompt individuals to make small changes such as reducing the frequency of their travels, which can help reduce the overall carbon footprint.
To sum up, the government making people responsible towards their own environment is indisputable. By means of educational campaigns and suitable punishments, more meaningful changes can be made from the individual's side.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-23 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-10 | phiennn | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-07 | eyraen | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-31 | tinavuuuu | 73 | view |
- Most agree that schools should be training children to recycle waste to preserve the Earth s natural resources However some believe that it is parents who should teach their children to recycle waste while others feel schools are more responsible Discuss 67
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaur dodo There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some feel that the effects of advertising are positive for individuals and businesses while others think they are negative Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 84
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is this the case Is it a positive or negative development 73
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, so, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35313531353 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13882034212 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623762376238 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1980627664 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.769230769 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259965769546 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983088355497 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13093550009 0.0667982634062 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186740116541 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850937229612 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.