Nowadays, an increasing number of people with health problems are using alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their normal doctor.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
In this modern world, the demand for health care is ubiquitous. There is now a numerable requirement for complementary medicines and therapy in lieu of seeing the professionals for checking up. From my perspective, this trend is obviously detrimental for human beings.
The first corollary is that this tendency escalates the exacerbation of health critical in humans. The culprit is the lack of professional knowledge of people before they decide to take any remedy; in addition, some conservative people, chiefly the old, assume that folk remedy is more effective than the state-of-the-art one regardless of its real efficacy. Another adverse influence of this inclination is the high propensity of being swindled by the fraud. Some people have low income so they endorse cheap things. The consequence is that they are easily fooled by scammers who take advantage of their credulity and these poors are likely to be broke. Last but not least, the revenue of official healthcare centers will sink to nosedive as a result of this tendency. The aftermath is the decline in trustworthy medical centres.
The supporters of the opposite view may argue that it is too costly for people to take the regular check-ups with the doctors. However, they fail to prove that there is not any fund raised for these poors. Numerous campaigns were launched in order to ease the problem from all over the world. Though these moral practices are unable to provide support for all, they contributed to diminution in health risks.
In conclusion, taking a holistic cure without the supervision of a doctor is risky and brings more of the demerits than the merits. Personally, i have a strong preference for orthodox medicine and i highly recommend people to adopt the similar.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-09 | minhnhat2002 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | maidiem1508 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | maidiem1508 | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | InamAli | 92 | view |
| 2022-09-01 | emkay | 89 | view |
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 73
- Nowadays an increasing number of people with health problems are using alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their normal doctor Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, so, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14532871972 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84222725481 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626297577855 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.507895835 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9375 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111627172015 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356772064295 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0220060481138 0.0667982634062 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.065196132933 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00689601336634 0.056905535591 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.