Nowadays it is not only large companies that can make films. Digital technology enables anyone to produce films. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays several great organisations are believed to lose their monopoly in the motion picture fields since any individuals can produce their own movie thanks to the development of electronic technologies. From my perspective, The advantages and drawbacks of this tendency are adequately the same
On the one hand, there is a variety of positive aspects that this growth brings. First of all, it helps discover numerous hidden talented film-makers. It is irrefutable that along with the advancement of the social network including Facebook or Youtube, the number of unknown people attaining the resounding success is rising at a breakneck speed. Although these videos are low-budget, they are still well-received by the general public, especially among youngsters and therefore increasing in popularity. Another explanation that worth-considering is that the more accessible filmmaking is, the more diversity in the cinematography. There seem to be shreds of evidence that movies produced by large companies are limited in theme and backgrounds with the aim of meeting the commercial demands. On the contrary, the films made by the unprofessional ones, albeit the shortage of skills and expenses, have a multitude of different topics.
Nevertheless, the adverse impacts of this kind of films should not be underestimated. First and foremost, it poses the censorship issues. Since there are thousands of movies are released every moment, it is extremely difficult to fully control the content of these films. Consequently, there is a great number of inappropriate screenplays which may target the children. The underlying reason behind this may originate from the fact that both the video-sharing flatforms' censorship systems are working inefficiently. In the second place, the authority rights may be infringed. It is undoubtedly true that the overnight sensation has a great attraction that numerous amateur filmmaker may do it by all means, which including copying other ideas and concepts without paying the royalties. This not only made the true artist suffering from starving and poverty but also inhibiting the development of the film industry.
To sum up, the growth of amateur filmmaker has found several talents as well as enriched the themes and background of the film industry, but it also poses the problem of censorship and put the authority rights at risk
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-28 | Trandinhphuc8.0 | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-24 | kieutrangkg1 | 56 | view |
| 2023-01-24 | kieutrangkg1 | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | Mirajanecute | 80 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 87 | view |
- In today s world of advanced science and technology we still greatly value our artists such as musicians painters and writers What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 89
- Some people believe that young people know about international pop and movie stars but know very little about famous people from history in their own country. Why is this? How can more interest be created in young people to gain more knowledge about their 73
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 84
- There is no future for public transport, because travelling by car is so much more convenient.Write your composition. 78
- What are the possible effects of living long on an individual and on the whole society 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of this tendency are adequately the same On the one hand, there is a variety of p...
^^^
Line 2, column 423, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...et, they are still well-received by the general public, especially among youngsters and theref...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, well, kind of, as well as, first of all, on the contrary, to sum up, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2005.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44836956522 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12263024515 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2019544393 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.941176471 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6470588235 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1764705882 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144884803872 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379746808067 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432316432761 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769222610854 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185146366433 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.