nowadays in many countries household waste example whole packaging is increasing day by day what are the causes for that how can this problem be solved
In this present era, people prefer food items, which have attractive packaging. Therefore, the waste of food packaging increasing in many nations. This essay will enshrine what is possible causes of it and also give reasonable solutions for it, which described in the following paragraphs.
To embarks with, plenty of negative effects of food packets which harms Society. first and foremost, if people take packaging food products and they threw that packaging materials into the garbage, then that place becomes home of mosquitoes, Which spreads various disease such as malaria, dengue, and many more. Moreover, the covering materials most probably made from plastic, that making process creates air pollution, which harms humans, animals, and birds too. For example, 50% of plastic manufactured in the USA, therefore the pollution ratio there is the highest among other countries and people suffering from problems.
on the other hand, various steps will reduce the effect of the issues. Firstly, if the government of country made an excellent chain of collecting garbage, then the population of Mosquito reduce, ultimately disease problem will be a decline or vanish. Secondly, authorities have to make a rule for use of plastic bags, which reduce the production of plastics, and the quality of air will increase, which helps humans and other creatures to live peacefully in the world. For instance, the government of India banned plastic bags, therefore air pollution is reduced there. Those are the main possible solution for problems of waste food packaging.
To conclude, while waste materials create problems, that can be solved through different steps. The main problem of waste materials are disease and pollution but that will solve by making garbage collecting chain and limited use of plastic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-28 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-09 | Kishanpatel | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-09 | Kishanpatel | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-01 | Keylaz | 68 | view |
- some people think it is important for children to take a lesson outside classroom For example by visiting place such as local companies or public building to what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Full offer a wide range of courses such as physics education music economics philosophy math English geography physics and history among all the subjects which one do you think is the most important and which one is the least important 61
- Adult youth are often call up for working for the development of communities some people say they should work volunteer where as other say that they should get paid discuss both the views and give your opinion 61
- Pressure on the school and university student is increasing and student or push too hard work when they are young do you think it is positive or negative development 56
- in many countries mainly tourist but not local people visit museum and historical site why does this happen and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...ts of food packets which harms Society. first and foremost, if people take packaging ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
... and people suffering from problems. on the other hand, various steps will redu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39436619718 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57752251148 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584507042254 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3504011805 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.428571429 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181477891785 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685347629714 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586680275946 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121208072277 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047498641327 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.