Nowadays in many countries household waste e.g.food packaging is increasing day by day. What are the causes for that? How can this problem be solved?
In this contemporary life, there are many countries that waste food packaging and this is increasing in this day. From my perspective, this causes from human habitat and this essay will examine the problems and how can this problem be solved.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of people waste food packaging day by day. First, government subsidies for food packaging are believed to equalize good product among companies regardless of their brand background, but food packaging always can be free in many supermarkets, so that this is the first reason for why people don’t unguarded packaging. This waste packaging support, presumably, tends not only to increase the overall bad habits of lower-income people but also to mitigate protect environment awareness, which promotes an hurtful society. Second, the causes for people waste packaging would result in a higher supply of people lack awareness and people today increasingly relying on the inherent nature of the environment. Especially, on their mind they just think food packaging used for hold product and throw away as soon as they get home and use the product. In fact, it is acknowledged that awareness and environment is imperative to foster economic growth and technological in any nations.
Nevertheless, this can give some negative effect but its potential solutions coexist. First, people waste food packaging would likely to pollution and financial tremendous strain on a country. Generating no income from packaging, companies could become over-reliant on the state budget for funding, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as healthcare systems and transport infrastructure. Government can need to have a rules that pay for packaging if they want to hold the product, therefore they can want to maintain recycling for long time. Second, people waste packaging tempt many young people including those who are not protecting pursuits or show no interest in environmental, thereby adding great for government and companies that and cause many pollution that these young people could have spent for how to protect environment courses and together preserve the environment. Others, the government should widely propagate the restriction of the use of plastic bags, which have a negative impact on the environment. It, instead would be a packaging viable option if the resources were focused on less privileged yet gifted people.
In conclusion, waste packaging is one of the serious pollution in many decades and this is not easy to solved. However, government need to consider the solution for have a better society and development country without waste.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-28 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-09 | Kishanpatel | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-01 | Keylaz | 68 | view |
- The diagram show the space journey of Soyuz rocket Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In some countries more and more adults are living with their parents after graduating from college University or even after finding a job In many cultures increasingly have adults and parents living together when they were grown up and graduated from scho 56
- Only reason to work hard is to earn money To what extent you do agree or disagree 73
- Table The price of a cup of coffee in six cities from 2010 to 2014 in Australia 61
- Some people think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problem Give your option 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 546, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...t environment awareness, which promotes an hurtful society. Second, the causes for...
^^
Line 3, column 789, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun pollution seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much pollution', 'a good deal of pollution'.
Suggestion: much pollution; a good deal of pollution
...government and companies that and cause many pollution that these young people could have spen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2255.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 421.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35629453682 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86047096899 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53919239905 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.7768575706 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.647058824 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7647058824 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399475177977 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130642413123 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10878161174 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269660864519 0.151304729494 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110870912439 0.056905535591 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.