About a couple of decades ago, men in our society played a pivotal role as a breadwinner in the house and his wife was responsible for household chores. With the innovation of knowledge about gender equality, it is necessary for men and women to divide housework equally. In my point of view, I completely agree with that statement which males and females should do household jobs together.
To begin, doing housework together does not improve efficiency, but also boost the affection of the wife and husband. Firstly, more and more supports from each other especially in household chores will maintain the relationship of couples even though they have been together for a long time. On top of that, when they divide household jobs equally, they will be finishing faster, and then, there will be a lot of spare time to watching movies together or hanging out with friends.
Moreover, the belief that household works are the responsibility of women will break the happiness of family and divorced rate. After a very hard-working day of husband and wife, females are continuously cramming for household chores alone meanwhile males are the only people who are able to relax, women will be put in depression and tiredness with regard to divorce. For instance, the divorced proportion of divided household jobs families is much lower than families that wives account for all household jobs in the entire house.
In conclusion, in order to maintain the happiness of the family and give more love to others, people should divide household works equally and also help the evolution of gender equality as well as equity.
- Some people think young people should be free to choose their job while others believe that they should be realistic and think about their future Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better 73
- The maps below show a book store in 2000 and now Summarise the main information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant 44
- The diagram shows the relationship between a number of different languages
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, then, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, with regard to, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02973977695 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64219445269 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579925650558 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.7844190607 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.3 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5 7.06120827912 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136293729055 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583535382736 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465927549282 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0790694498049 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369191541279 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.