Nowadays, many people cannot read or write. Why is this? What measures can governments take to solve these problems?
In this age, a section of the world population is suffering illiteracy. There are several culprits for this phenomenon and steps should be taken immediately by governments to resolve this pressing issue.
For one thing, illiteracy could be characterized by a number of factors, chief of which stem from the lack of financial capacity of the impoverished to afford formal education. The stark reality in many developing countries is that economic growth often accompany surging living costs. In this sense, individuals who come from family in with low socio-economic status generally struggle to cover their fundamental requirements, which has already overtaken the money spent on education. One of the hypothetical example could be Viet Nam, this developing country still have to face illiteracy when an overwhelming majority population of ethnic groups are suffering poverty in the absence of financial aid from the state. Additionally, this group commonly makes their own poor living based on agriculture activities, which generate merely no incomes to support their studies. Consequently, financial predicaments perpetuate illiteracy over generations, which is deemed a hindrance to national progress.
For another, some measures should be adopted by the official administrations to alleviate the situation. Firstly, formal education in public school should be offered free to individuals from poor financial backgrounds. Focusing on the disadvantaged not only allows state to get to the root of the problem but also promote social equality since children are admitted to educational institution without concerning the discrimination in terms of finance. Furthermore, once illiteracy is curbed, governments could allocate resources on improving teaching quality by providing specialized courses for tutors. Instructions should be delivered in a way that students could easily interpret, even to those who have unprecedentedly received any form of teaching program.
To conclude, there are reasons for the emergence of illiteracy. Nonetheless, the suggested initiatives could combat this issue, given the financial and human resources are appropriately utilized.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-30 | Linhharty | 67 | view |
| 2022-03-16 | dennynguyen30 | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-25 | crownbeea | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-22 | nguyentranvn | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-21 | markeusiii | 56 | view |
- The world of work is changing rapidly and people cannot depend on the same job or the same conditions of work for life Discuss the possible causes for these changes and give your suggestions on how people should prepare for work in the future 89
- Some people think that personal happiness is directly related to economic success Others argue that happiness depends on different factors Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The bar chart shows the number of visitors to four London museums Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart shows the number of visitors to four London museums 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, nonetheless, so, still, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84542586751 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24243880866 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630914826498 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1485729419 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.533333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.078879163442 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0270842872408 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0262654691134 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0548171579504 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314053053665 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.