Nowadays, more and more jobs and tasks are done by machines which involve hard physical work. Do these positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects?
Human beings have researched machines for centuries, expecting to bring more convenience to society. There has a tendency that machines are replacing hard physical jobs which were performed by mankind gradually. Although some people support that the positive impact of this trend would far more than the negative ones, I still think the wide application of machines could bring many drawbacks.
Admittedly, it sounds plausible that adopting machines would improve work efficiency. Contemporary intelligent equipment are most adjusted by advanced technology. Thus, they have the ability to tackle difficult problems rapidly and finish their tasks accurately, boosting the efficiency of the assembly line. For example, many car- washes services are provided by machines to substitute manual labour. This kind of service saves drivers’ time with an outstanding cleaning result.
Although the statement above is understandable, I still believe that replacing human workforce by machines is not a positive tendency. Firstly, this trend is not benefiting comprehensive development of small-size companies. In order to catch the counterparts’ pace, such small companies need to afford a large expenditure on introducing intelligent control system. Consequently, there may not enough money to improve other vital parts so the company could not expand further. For example, paying more attention to equipment would decrease the employees’ welfare, leading to the disloyalty of workers.
Additionally, the economic burden of the government would be accumulated if mankind workforce are replaced by machines. It is obvious that lacking economic resources make many employees cannot support their families and life. Therefore, government has to update related policies to drop the unemployment rate and give assistance to people who lose their jobs. In this way, the whole society would suffer great layoff pressure.
In conclusion, I believe that introducing machines to jobs without limitation is not a positive trend. Although machines could bring some convenience to human life, the drawbacks cannot be ignored.
- Some people think that computers and the internet are more important for a child's education than going to school. But others believe that schools and teachers are essential for children to learn effectively. Discuss both views and give your own opin 84
- Some people believe that teachers and parents should supervise children s activities closely while others think they need more freedom Discuss both views and give your own opinion 74
- Some people believe that in order to reduce crimes, prisoners should be given longer prison sentences while some people think there are other alternative ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- Nowadays, more and more jobs and tasks are done by machines which involve hand physical work. Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects. 73
- Nowadays more and more jobs and tasks are done by machines which involve hard physical work Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun car seems to be countable; consider using: 'many cars'.
Suggestion: many cars
...ency of the assembly line. For example, many car- washes services are provided by machin...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, as to, for example, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82371794872 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06538803365 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61858974359 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9002973604 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.6315789474 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4210526316 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73684210526 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196266847293 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542820472357 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585029757857 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109060807752 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830278933441 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.18 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.