Nowadays more and more young people hold the important positions in the government. Some people think that is a good thing while others argue that it is not suitable . Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
These days, a number of countries have a tendency of appointing young leader to vital position in the government. Although people are divided that whether this approach is suitable for governing nation or not, I believe that young manager generation would blow a new wind of change throughout countries.
On the one hand, youthfull officials have several advantages in administrating and leading their countries compared with older ones. Firstly, young officers who work for government, obviously, are highly educated at the cut-edge of management, technology, economy and so on. Thus, they have approached with new trends that can be applied to make their tasks of management more efficient and effortless. The young Primer Minister in my country, for example, have exerted a number of modern technologies such as e-books and online learning into education system. After implementing his project for 3 years, the education now stared off obtaining positive results. Secondly, As the favor of young age, bureaucrats could create new outstanding innovative ideas in order to simplify administrative procedures and optimize government systems. Therefore, building a strong government that can be trusted by people to lead the country to welfare and happiness
On the other hand, Young leaders have inevitable drawbacks and unsuitable points when ruling countries. In the first place, Lack of experience in reality and working in national level is the biggest disadvantages. Some positions in government not only require academic background in this field but also the experience that accumulated after long working time. For instance, a foreign minister extremely need international diplomatic experiences in order to represent to whole country in global meetings. Moreover, because they are young people, they should desire to have their families and take care of their children. However, playing well both roles as a leader of country and a mother/father in family may result in some conflicts. Unavoidably, young officials is distracted from their task in government due to private stuff while older ones usually have a more stable private lives.
In conclusion, even if fresh leaders may make some mistakes when leading nation, i believe that they will make government as well people in country dynamic and stronger.
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Many people go to university for academic study. More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers. To what extent do youagree or disagree? 89
- Many people go to university for academic study More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers To what extent do you agree or disagree 57
- Advertising is all around us it is an unavoidable part of everyone s life Some people say that advertising is a positive part of our lives while others say it is a negative one Discuss both views and include your own opinion Give reasons for your answer a 87
- Whether or not someone achieves their aim is mostly by question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e private lives. In conclusion, even if fresh leaders may make some mistakes whe...
^^
Line 4, column 83, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...make some mistakes when leading nation, i believe that they will make government ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47206703911 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91623991284 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614525139665 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.206907789 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.4375 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1875 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131508813565 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411484043704 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311488296564 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.08017544967 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386600362183 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.