There has been rational evidence suggesting that people are calling into a question about the importance of World Cup Games in 21st century. This interpretation can provide us with insights into starting to fade the role of international sporting events in the recent century. I, however, completely disagree with the given assertion on the basis of compelling reasons.
To begin with, the most rational justification is that international sporting events help to build a friendly correlation among countries, in particular, hostile country. Take India and Pakistan as an example which have disputes in an array of issues. But contentions would be overlooked when it comes to the cricket playground. Teams would compete with a friendly attitude toward together. Hence, it is expected, if this tendency continues, unfriendly relationship turns into warmer in upcoming years.
Along with this, world cup events can bring huge foreign revenue to host country owing to a number of reasonable reasons. Firstly, rivals and sports lovers who would take part in the competition spend a large part of their budget to buy some souvenir. Secondly, the host country would be introduced well to holidaymakers worldwide and other tourists which lead to encourage them to visit such spot. Moreover, holding international sporting events would motivate the youth generation of the host country to follow a healthy lifestyle or even change their lifestyle.
To conclude, there are valid arguments that underscore the vital role of the Olympic games. This is mainly because of the benefit accruing from making friendly relationship, promoting income level, booming tourism industry are still by no means negligible.
- Some people say it is a good idea for all employees to wear a uniform at work To what extent do you agree or disagree 96
- International travel and tourism makes people prejudiced rather than broad minded What are its causes and what measures can be taken to solve this problem 89
- people should look after their health as a duty to the society where they live rather than their own benefits what extend do you agree or disagree 87
- Government should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organizations To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people say that young people can learn useful skills by playing electronic and computer games. Others say that young people who play electronic and computer games are wasting their time. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, in particular, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47348484848 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88696754598 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662878787879 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.399884314 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.214285714 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0984109636038 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335813204344 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588059601836 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0659418075951 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077003998967 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.