Nowadays people can buy a large variety of household goods, more than ever before in most countries in the world. Is this a good or bad development? Give your opinion and examples.
With the advent of advanced technology, modern people have currently more choices to purchase different kinds of household products, compared to the past. In this essay, I will address that negative and positive influence that this trend would have on people's lives and the whole society since it has merits and demerits.
To begin with, I think enabling people to buy a wide range of household items would be advantageous to people's lives. Primarily, with the help of increased options, customers could decide any kinds of products that are more suitable for their lifestyle and living environment. More importantly, this would improve the quality of life since they are more likely to be satisfied with their purchase when they compare various home items. For example, in a recent survey in South Korea, many single households reported that they experienced satisfactory shopping in the wake of various options of house appliances that are specially tailored to people living alone. Obviously, they do not need to buy family-sized rice cooker which used to be the only option in the past.
Having said that, due to various kinds of home products, there are several drawbacks to the whole society. The more people have choices, the more they are inclined to buy items, even though they are not necessary. This would not only promote compulsive shopping habits in society, but it would also <font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman"><span style="font-size: 18.6667px;">increase rubbish, hence, </span></font>exacerbating environmental degradation regarding waste management. In particular, e-waste is problematic since toxic pollutants from it such as mercury are easily absorbed into soil and water in the landfill. Additionally, this would be severe because customers are attracted to various appliances from automated vacuum cleaners to multifunctional fridges which make house chores easier than ever.
To surmise, I think increased access to various household goods cuts both ways in terms of more customer choices, but promoting compulsive buying and compounding the environment ills.
- Nowadays people can buy a large variety of household goods, more than ever before in most countries in the world. Is this a good or bad development? Give your opinion and examples. 84
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people believe that for a hobby to be enjoyable it should be hard to acquire or learn. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, regarding, so, for example, i think, in particular, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64485981308 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5592633107 2.80592935109 127% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595015576324 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0904107723 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.384615385 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146051816421 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057326428056 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403523029997 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981908362681 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154368634292 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.