In this modern society people are more into disposable culture or replaced by some new version of that particular thing. Due to this trend one could face problem in their lifestyle, like financial crisis. The environment also affect from these trend. In the other hand, it is useful for economical growth, but there are more drawbacks than the benefits. According to my opinion, these use and throw style is more disadvantageous.
Nowadays, in every small time of period new technology is created and adopted by people. Individuals purchase them even they have already it, and then that old item become waste. People waste their money on these newly designed item which attract more. It inspire to get out from budget which results in to financial crisis. Sometimes, one could face burden of debts. For instance , new version of Apple mobile was launch which has more functions compare to previous version, without that newly functions other mobiles are also present at the market. It is a luxuries mobile ever, but people want that because of its new developed technologies. For that some people go out from there budget and spend uncertain money on it.
These culture also impact on environment. There are many stuff which used by people once and throw in environment and never recycled. There are some kind of things which are never reused, like disposable dishes and glasses. It is made from plastic and plastic is most dangerous factor for surrounding. For instance, nowadays in parties these plates are common because of their disposable nature. It is a garbage after its usage, one could not use second time.
In conclusion, people waste their money by replacing and throwing unnecessary things and also harm environment. It has more disadvantages rather than economical advantage of producers.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Harnoor
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... financial crisis. The environment also affect from these trend. In the other hand, it is u...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...nd. In the other hand, it is useful for economical growth, but there are more drawbacks t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or economical growth, but there are more drawbacks than the benefits. According t...
^^
Line 2, column 257, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'inspires'?
Suggestion: inspires
...ly designed item which attract more. It inspire to get out from budget which results in...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 381, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...could face burden of debts. For instance , new version of Apple mobile was launch ...
^^
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun stuff seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much stuff', 'a good deal of stuff'.
Suggestion: much stuff; a good deal of stuff
...e also impact on environment. There are many stuff which used by people once and throw in ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'kinds'?
Suggestion: kinds
...ment and never recycled. There are some kind of things which are never reused, like ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'garbage'.
Suggestion: garbage
...cause of their disposable nature. It is a garbage after its usage, one could not use seco...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...than economical advantage of producers.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10135135135 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60149331373 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560810810811 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6264728099 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.9047619048 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0952380952 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149100734524 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435276889718 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488496796239 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111604465747 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561631145255 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.