Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things. Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages?
It is clear that people have a tendency to discard their old or damaged possessions thesedays when they own something new. One of the most controversial issues today relates to Is replacement of old things with new ones give benefits to the owner or not? I am going to examine this question from both points of view.
One side of the argument there are people who argue that the demerits of this considerably outweigh its advantages. The main reason for believing this is that the wastage of electricity, gas and other resources because when there is a rise in the demand due to the more consumtion of the product so, the use of machines will increase for making products that leads to incline in pollution. It is also possible to say that many additional resources are used for production of new things such as plastic, rubber and so on. Most importantly, these elements take long to decompose as a result, these create soil and air pollution. A recent survey research states that Canada and United States of America contains only 5.2% of the world's population are accountable 31.5% of consumtion while, South Asia which had 22.4% of the population is only responsible for only 2% of consumption.
On the other hand, it is also possible to make the opposing case. People often have this opinion because when individuals use new gadgets besides old ones, they can enhance their knowledge by using new features as well as they can also make their works easy. Hence, society moves forward. A second point is that advance technology can also be helpful for medical sector because if doctors replace their old machines with the latest technical gadgets, it will enable them to find more cures. Therfore, new products can minimise number of incidents, such as deaths.
As we have seen that there are number of answers to this question. On balance however, I tend to believe that the possibilities are endless, a person just have to take the initiative and make the change and authorities can also reduce this problem by making new laws.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-28 | Sandeep kaur12 | 11 | view |
| 2018-06-27 | Baljitkuar | 56 | view |
| 2018-06-27 | Love kaler | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-27 | Love kaler | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-27 | Love kaler | 78 | view |
- The circular chart reveals the four main courses of land degradation and the tobular chart illustrates the different regions during the year of 1990. It shows the percentum. 56
- The circular chart depicts show the main reasons of land degradation.illustrates tbe affected degrated land in three main causes of during in the year of 1990.it can be shows the percentum. 56
- Some people say that computer games are bad for childrenby all means while others believe that these games are contributing to childrens development. 67
- The graphs below show the weekly earnings of men and women in euros for the 16 59 age groups as per their education level 57
- The pie chart illustrated the working in children. It shows the same circles in children working in percentage. It shows the percentum. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 727, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...es of America contains only 5.2% of the worlds population are accountable 31.5% of con...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...number of incidents, such as deaths. As we have seen that there are number of a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, hence, however, if, second, so, well, while, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83142857143 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59152307278 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565714285714 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.3708312657 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.733333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125416196275 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452401549588 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380656692887 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788311079858 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315699436544 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.