Nowadays people throw away old things and adopt new things, do the disadvantage of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantage.
The mindset of people in this modern era is prompting many civilised people to throwing away the old things and adapt to new things. Apparently throwaway society has more disadvantages than any expected economic advantage.
Firstly, the main reason why people acquired a habit of throwing away things is due to lifestyle changes. Many people pretend to be wealthy and show-off their belongings in public. In an attempt of this false speculations, they buy fashionable and expensive things unnecessarily, which indirectly leads to throw off old stuff prematurely from home. This lifestyle in turn is leading to loss of some basic cultural heritages which were carefully secured by older generations. Usually with time these heritages become rugged and corrugated unless cleaned at proper intervals.
Secondly, the human being is a social animal. The desire to get more and more is exceptional. Satisfaction from little is greatly spared in the present society. Advertisements and dramas are seriously followed and quest of getting happiness is fulfilled by buying new things and adapting new lifestyle. Further, the general public follows celebrities who are basically from the world of glamour, propelling them to mimic their way of living and buying expensive items. Such a trend is a huge financial burden on society reflecting economic burden to the whole nation, indirectly. Donating pre-owned things to less privileged humans would bring an extensive insight on humanity and is the only positive side of a society that keeps itself updated by leaving away old things.
Considering briefly, in my opinion, the present trend of throw away old stuff has numerous disadvantages as every small thing can be useful unless completely worn out. Disadvantages of throw away society are no way near to the possible economic advantage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-02 | simrankaur87917@gmail.com | 56 | view |
- The government should spend money on railways rather than on roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement. 78
- The government should spend money on railways rather than on roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement. 78
- In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 78
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 83
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adopt new things do the disadvantage of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantage 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 317, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...nd adapting new lifestyle. Further, the general public follows celebrities who are basically f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, briefly, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39446366782 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87036683353 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615916955017 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6494827432 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4375 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365449217011 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104650469301 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116041915667 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253610602676 0.151304729494 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143175604591 0.056905535591 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.