with the proliferation of smartphones and the internet, people use social media to keep in touch with friends and family members ,and know about the latest news. I think this trend has numerous advantages ranging from easy accessibility of the network to immediate access to latest development. This has few disadvantages such as lesser physical contact with others. I think the advantages far outweigh the disadvantages.
To begin with, the social media websites such as Facebook, Instagram, and twitter have made access to friends and relatives extremely easy. A person can contact with another person who living at far distant place, through the Facebook messenger, and learn about other person latest updates on Instagram. All this is available on a smartphones and there is no need to go outside. Moreover, staying at home one can check other friends information with assistance of facebook news feed and twitter is a lofty source of national and international development. For an example, one can follow the page of news in the Twitter such as, The Guardians, with this a person can watch and get touch with latest news update minute by minutes from overseas.
On the flip side, the utilization of social media is often blamed for a person's discount with his immediate surrounding. One can notice people engrossed in the screens of their mobile phones instead of talking to another person. To cite an instance, a recent study in India revealed that individuals who were born after 1990 spend more than 40 percent of their time to interacting with their friends through social media. So, this will lead the conflicts with families and generate the disparity difference with each others.
To conclude, with the assistance of social media sites and internet people can easily commute with each others and this is extremely simple way to access latest updates from friends and also from overseas while follow the page on social sites. Albeit, the pro's are more as compare to the con's, but, the heavy use of these sites, it will be the adverse impact on person's relationship.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
with the proliferation of smartphones and th...
^^^^
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...in touch with friends and family members ,and know about the latest news. I think ...
^^
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the latest'.
Suggestion: to the latest
...lity of the network to immediate access to latest development. This has few disadvantages...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'person the latest'.
Suggestion: person the latest
...cebook messenger, and learn about other person latest updates on Instagram. All this is avail...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 687, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
...h this a person can watch and get touch with latest news update minute by minutes from over...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'access the latest'.
Suggestion: access the latest
...ers and this is extremely simple way to access latest updates from friends and also from over...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...social sites. Albeit, the pros are more as compare to the cons, but, the heavy use...
^^
Line 7, column 363, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...sites, it will be the adverse impact on persons relationship.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, while, i think, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05217391304 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65392988516 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536231884058 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7292223502 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.2 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331414209129 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110766977585 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696251825773 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215586554492 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762840941481 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.