Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away?
At the present day, wasting the massive amount of food purchased from supermarkets and restaurants is a familiar phenomenon in some countries. This essay will investigate the principal reasons for this issue, as well as beneficial and creative solutions in the following paragraphs with smooth examples, before a reasoned conclusion.
It is indisputable that the transparent cause of wasting meals is the irresponsibility of inhabitants towards the environment and the development of cities. Mainly because, this problem especially, facing developed and flourishing nations like the USA, Singapour, UK and etc, however, there are some cities where most of the people are suffering from poverty. For instance, it is an irrefutable fact that the percentages of food shortages have been considerably accelerating in Africa over the years. The next reason is the majority of parents do not give the correct upbringing to their children, and they are regularly busy with their works in order to find the money. As a result of this consequence, some children are wasting food by do not consume it on the time. Therefore, the environment is contaminating day by day because of the throwing away massive amounts of meals.
On the other side, one of the most beneficial solutions to this issue is educating children to secure the environment. That is because if parents or teachers explain to children how to save the world, they also transfer this knowledge to their subsequent generations. The second effective solution is installing extra containers which assist to collect the meals on the streets. As a result, it would be extremely convenient to recycle foods that are thrown away by the citizens. Furthermore, if people work hard on themselves, they can explore other creative ways to tackle wasting food.
To sum up, lack of education, as well as a revolution are the primary causes of that problem, and educating generations, installing extra containers would be the best solutions to tackle it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | Hoàng Ngọc Thảo My | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | nle.hngoc | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | minhtuvn23 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | phamminhtu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | phamminhtu | 61 | view |
- Some systems require students to specialize in a limited range of subjects from the age of fifteen Other systems require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of these two education systems and which is b 61
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the Anthropologists in work after 5 years 73
- The diagram below shows how the instant noodles are manufactured Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram below shows how rain water is collected and then treated to be used as drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, as a result, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23987538941 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05250807267 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563862928349 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6422680362 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.142857143 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238085421855 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08159086509 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825317678208 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127260572223 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674673180316 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.