Nowadays some people are giving more importance to consumer goods in their lives. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development and how do they weigh again each other?
In a hustle world of globalization, it is clear that convenient stuffs play an important role in our lives such as air conditioner, refrigerator or heater. With speedy development of technology, while several benefits create a luxurious life, we also cannot irgone some drawbacks which might threaten our natural environment.
First of all, it is no doubt that the numerous consumer thing is beneficial for economic growth. The more people consume goods, the more social fund increases. By earning money from goods, the government would have a lot of taxes which develope infrastructures and invest in advance sciences. As a result, our living standard is improved and maybe some of fatal diseases are cured. Moreover, these consumer goods can save much time in daily life. Particularly, in stead of washing a ton of clothes in hours, they just put all of them in a machine then click and wait them clean less than an hour. Therefore, with busy people in the city, the necessary of consumer equitments seems bring many positive effects.
However, it is also argued that these devices could have some negative aspects in human life. Most use of appliances requires high energy consumption which lead to a higher environmental pollution all around the would. Hence, the natural resources are exhausted and the price of fuel energy is lifted rapidly. Moreover, people who frequently rely on using consumer devices would become obesity and sedentary lifestyle. the cooked food in microwave is not good for health as probably lack subtenants for body growth.
To include, in spite of all benefits, the drawbacks of using electrical devices should be certainly concerned. The government has to restrict consumption by rising taxes and declaring suitable policies. Besides, citizen should raise awareness about conserve our nature by reducing emission and toxic waste which from consumer goods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-03-01 | mrpocker94 | 84 | view |
- 100 years ago people thought that human race was steadily making progress in all areas of life nowadays there is less certainty that is so In what areas do you think the most important progress has been made so far In what areas more things need to be don 87
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking 79
- Nowadays some people are giving more importance to consumer goods in their lives. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development and how do they weigh again each other? 84
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- It is necessary to parents to attend parenting training course to bring their children up Do u agree or disagree 76
Comments
Thank you
Thank you
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: IN_STEAD_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'instead of'?
Suggestion: instead of
... much time in daily life. Particularly, in stead of washing a ton of clothes in hours, they...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 419, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...become obesity and sedentary lifestyle. the cooked food in microwave is not good fo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, as to, no doubt, such as, as a result, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25412541254 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76361604756 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660066006601 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.126261352 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.6470588235 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76470588235 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127126404132 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384771408952 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392481393149 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0673108233847 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466118465442 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.