Nowadays there is a growing shift towards the use of cashless transactions While some people argue in support of a cashless society claiming that it is beneficial to citizens others raise concerns about security To what extent do you agree or disagree Use

In recent years, as a result of digital revolution, Internet has been widely used as a means of transactions. Whether or not cashless society should be supported is a matter of debate. From my own viewpoint, I partly agree with the notion that cashless transactions have more benefits than drawbacks.
On the one hand, online transactions bring a lot of merits. First and foremost, the most outstanding advantage of cashless transactions is convenience. By some simple steps on smartphone, for instance, people can purchase anyting everytime. As a result, it help peple save time for other work. In addition, online transactions help people manage their money more easily. In other words, each person has his own bank account containing money which he sets aside. As a consequence, people will not forget or lose their money.
On the other hand, cashless society has some notable demerits. To begin with, people who use online transactions may suffer from security’s problem. To be more specific, some criminals rip people off by hacking their bank account to stole their money. Consequently, this problem has negative influences on human’s life, especially their living standards. Furthermore, cashless transactions have complicated system. Elderly citizens, for example, do not know how to use online transactions due to not keeping up with technology’s development. As a result, it does them out of purchasing what they need for living.
In conclusion, the aforementioned facts have created a dilemma when people weigh up the pros and cons of this issue. As far as I am concerned, I put more highlight on the idea that people should not abuse the use of cashless transactions.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...widely used as a means of transactions. Whether or not cashless society should be suppo...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
...widely used as a means of transactions. Whether or not cashless society should be supported is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 257, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...hase anyting everytime. As a result, it help peple save time for other work. In addi...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21691176471 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04587323275 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606617647059 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.1159907958 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.6842105263 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3157894737 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57894736842 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252724162228 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768017670134 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054217878011 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153021439266 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423760445931 0.056905535591 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...widely used as a means of transactions. Whether or not cashless society should be suppo...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
...widely used as a means of transactions. Whether or not cashless society should be supported is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 257, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...hase anyting everytime. As a result, it help peple save time for other work. In addi...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21691176471 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04587323275 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606617647059 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.1159907958 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.6842105263 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3157894737 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57894736842 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252724162228 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768017670134 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054217878011 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153021439266 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423760445931 0.056905535591 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.