“Nowadays there is a growing shift towards the use of cashless transactions. While some people argue in support of a cashless society, claiming that it is beneficial to citizens, others raise concerns about security.”
To what extent do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. Write an essay of about 250 words to express your ideas.
In the era of advanced technology, there is a rising trend relating to cashless transactions. People have mixed opinions about this special situation and wonder if it is safe or insecure. Personally, I think this issue can be seen in both positive and negative perspective.
On the one hand, transacting without cash provides a great number of benefits. First and foremost, it assures better security. To be more specific, many online banks guarantee their clients by regulating the whole systems in order to keep people’s money safe, moreover, banks usually have a policy that will compensate customers if there are some minor errors with their bank accounts. Additionally, convenience is also a considerable factor. In other words, instead of taking the money out of the bank and sending it away like the old days, people now can exchange money simply with just a click on ther phones. Besides, storing money online also save you a lot, because it means you do not need to spend your income on things such as safes or lockers.
On the other hand, cashless transactions are believed to be extremely problematic. Firstly, this form of transaction can be complicated. To be more expicitly, some older people do not have knowledge to do such things because technology is too sopisticated for them to make sense of. Furthermore, it is true that a majority of people can run a risk of fraud. My parents, for example, used to lose money on a bank account which was created a completely fake company. Hence, individuals should be aware of these undersirable situations.
In conclusion, cashless transactions certainly have a positive impact on our daily life but comes along with them is a risk of loss or security. People should use them in the most clever way to make full use of them as well as avoid bothersome consequences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-05 | Hoangiangpham | 67 | view |
| 2022-12-05 | Hoangiangpham | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-05 | Hoangiangpham | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-05 | Hoangiangpham | 61 | view |
| 2022-12-05 | Hoangiangpham | 56 | view |
- Nowadays there is a growing shift towards the use of cashless transactions While some people argue in support of a cashless society claiming that it is beneficial to citizens others raise concerns about security To what extent do you agree or disagree Use 84
- Nowadays there is a growing shift towards the use of cashless transactions While some people argue in support of a cashless society claiming that it is beneficial to citizens others raise concerns about security To what extent do you agree or disagree Use 73
- Nowadays there is a growing shift towards the use of cashless transactions While some people argue in support of a cashless society claiming that it is beneficial to citizens others raise concerns about security To what extent do you agree or disagree Use 61
- Nowadays there is a growing shift towards the use of cashless transactions While some people argue in support of a cashless society claiming that it is beneficial to citizens others raise concerns about security To what extent do you agree or disagree Use 56
- Nowadays there is a growing shift towards the use of cashless transactions While some people argue in support of a cashless society claiming that it is beneficial to citizens others raise concerns about security To what extent do you agree or disagree Use 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92233009709 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87083655712 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614886731392 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5857199736 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4705882353 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1764705882 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7647058824 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161001355879 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471084835909 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391308583781 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975005541774 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311946080187 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92233009709 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87083655712 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614886731392 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5857199736 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4705882353 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1764705882 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7647058824 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161001355879 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471084835909 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391308583781 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975005541774 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311946080187 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.