Advanced technology has changed the way people communicate with one another as, people prefer spending their free time on social media like facebook, to make new friends and chat with them, which has further, let to lack of socialization among individuals. Moreover, types of relationships made by people have changed as they ignore members of family around them and try to connect to strangers on internet. Inspite of positive development, there are more negative developments.
Firstly, members of family and near and dear one's are ignored, they spend lot of time on internet communicating with strangers which causes weak bonding among blood relations. Secondly, they make many friends on social media and in reality left alone, we get so engrossed in making new friends that we desocialize ourselves from others, which causes loneliness and finally lead to depression, especially in youngsters. For instance, high rates of individual cases are found among new generation due to depression and loneliness as they have no one in reality to share their problems and happiness. And lastly, people get so addicted to use of technology, they end up watching objectional contents and also develop negative effects like health problems, for eg, obesity and emotional disturbance like loneliness and depression.
Some people think technology has made communication easier, as people can connect to anyone globally within seconds and also at low cost, because there are availability of video calling, skype and IMO which makes possible to call people locally as well as internationally. It has also help people to become socially active and reconnect with old friends as there is a facebook website which helps to find old and lost friends contacts. However, I think it is important to make use of technology but at the same time it is more cruicial to maintain strong relationship with people around us as they are the one's who stay with us at the difficult stage of our life.
In conclusion, technology can never replace human beings, it should be used for good of people and not to destroy relationships. Technology is productive when used in a proper way.
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Discu 83
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant exa 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and ma 78
- In many countries, there is no access to education for children in remote villages/communities. Some people believe that the best solution is to provide teachers and schools. Others think computer and internet connection is better selection. Discuss both 61
- Prevention is better than cure. Researching and treating diseases is too clostly so it would be better to invest in preventive measures.To what extent do you agree? 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'helped'.
Suggestion: helped
...as well as internationally. It has also help people to become socially active and re...
^^^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ips. Technology is productive when used in a proper way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'lastly', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'well', 'for instance', 'i think', 'in conclusion', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.243523316062 0.247107183377 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.176165803109 0.155533422707 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0829015544041 0.0946595960268 88% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0647668393782 0.0501214627716 129% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0544041450777 0.0437548338989 124% => OK
Prepositions: 0.139896373057 0.122226691241 114% => OK
Participles: 0.0440414507772 0.0403226058552 109% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.88489077508 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0388601036269 0.0326793684256 119% => OK
Particles: 0.00259067357513 0.00163938923432 158% => OK
Determiners: 0.0233160621762 0.0861772015684 27% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00777202072539 0.021408717616 36% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0181347150259 0.011925033212 152% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2160.0 1933.35771543 112% => OK
No of words: 351.0 316.048096192 111% => OK
Chars per words: 6.15384615385 6.12580529183 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20517956788 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.373219373219 0.374742101984 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.287749287749 0.28420135186 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.202279202279 0.203846283523 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.14245014245 0.137316102897 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88489077508 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.037074148 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575498575499 0.56093040696 103% => OK
Word variations: 65.054115375 60.7387585426 107% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0891783567 75% => OK
Sentence length: 29.25 20.7743622355 141% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.859075787 49.517814964 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.0 127.492653851 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.25 20.7743622355 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.41666666667 0.814263465372 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 58.0249287749 49.1944974215 118% => OK
Elegance: 1.44736842105 1.69124875643 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280354825938 0.332605444948 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.13870564276 0.102741220458 135% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0545481236084 0.0668466124924 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.611731664422 0.534860350844 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.131036979066 0.148594505496 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128804737044 0.134430193775 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664785357488 0.0742795772207 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.276819792869 0.324371583561 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0666171417828 0.0638462369009 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207447431385 0.228012699653 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0840903566727 0.058150111329 145% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.68436873747 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.41683366733 29% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 5.90881763527 85% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.5751503006 194% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.4468937876 105% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.