Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In today modern era, people tend to communicate with each other through the Internet with the help of modern technologies. These led to the changes in the relationships of many people. I this essay, I will be discussing both sides of this development.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that the improvements in technology changed the way people communicate in several positive ways. Firstly, the appearance of social media allows people to have a new relationship with a stranger who shares common interests and hobbies only with their smartphone which is quite convenient. Secondly, people are now having the ability to talk and transfer their ideas using email or through chatting services without having to worry about the geographical boundaries. For example, business partners could be able to create a meeting using Skype even though they are in different countries.
On the other hand, these developments had led to several problems. The lacks of face to face conversations is one of the main problems which was caused by social media. People tend to communicate through social media rather than talking in real life. In some cases, people might not know what to say when they meet their friends in real life, however, they still have plenty of ideas to discuss when they chat on Facebook. For instance, there are some teenagers in my country only use their smartphone to chat with their friends, even though they are sitting right in front of each other. Moreover, there are some high tech criminals have the ability to hack into people social media account and then use it to chat with their friends in order to exploit their credit cards and personal information which is extremely dangerous.
In conclusion, while the development of technology could be beneficial for many people, it stills have several drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Ngochai | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Harrynguyen1980 | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Garrett | 84 | view |
- Some people prefer to provide help or support directly to the local community Others prefer to give money to national or international charitable organizations Discuss both views and give ur opinions 79
- Living in big cities is bad for people's health. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- Some people believe that if a police force carries guns, this encourages higher level of violence in that society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 56
- Some people think it is more important for government to spend public money on promoting healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Leaders and directors in organizations are often older people Some people say that younger people could be leaders Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04620462046 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67976230912 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554455445545 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3509334613 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.214285714 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207898329867 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781136771419 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529300455455 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139561811427 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402133978684 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.