The tradition that famliy gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts on families and societies?
In the modern life, families do not have foods together as they used to be in the past. This change led to several problems on either families or societies. In this essay, I will be discussing these problems along with the causes of this concerning change in tradition.
There are various factors contributed to the transformation of family’s eating habits. Firstly, due to the difference between work and study schedule in the present and the past, family members are now no longer be able to go home at the same time so it is difficult for them to have meals together. Secondly, the intense amount of works is also made a huge impact on this change in family’s eating. Employees or even the CEO of the company often go home late because there are plenty of works to deal with, as a result, they usually buy foods online and eat while they are doing their tasks. Finally, since the invention of fast foods, people are likely to eat at the fast foods stores rather than cooking at home because of it convenient. For instance, in Vietnam, many parents give their children money to buy fast foods so instead of going home and cook lunch or dinner for them, they will stay at their company to finish their businesses.
This tradition alteration has caused several issues both in families and the society. Since people no longer gather for meals, they will not be able to share their stories and the bond between family members will be faded by time. The understanding between parents and their children are also be limited and eventually, at some point, parents will no longer understand their children which would create conflicts. Moreover, the disappearance of this tradition will make a huge impact on the society since in special occasions people do not feel the need to organize a family reunion so these occasions might be forgotten in the future.
In conclusion, the transformation of family meals is the result of myriad factors which have caused several in the families as well as in societies.
The tradition that famliy gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts on families and societies?The tradition that famliy gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts on families and societies?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-11 | RyanHoang190398 | 89 | view |
| 2018-11-11 | mostafa jahangiri | 61 | view |
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basic. What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time. 73
- Some people think it is more important for government to spend public money on promoting healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people prefer to provide help or support directly to the local community Others prefer to give money to national or international charitable organizations Discuss both views and give ur opinions 79
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?Give reasons for your answer and inclu 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...e the impacts on families and societies?The tradition that famliy gets together to ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84223918575 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64696850303 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4631043257 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7958757167 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.157894737 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6842105263 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21052631579 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348164968303 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18935666575 0.084324248473 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.245728818501 0.0667982634062 368% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266849371892 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.366923912853 0.056905535591 645% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.