Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?
Technology has changed the method people communicate recently, for example, video call is believed as an alternatives replacing direct face-to-face meeting. Furthermore, young people are mostly interested in such way of interacting rather than real-life communication. Regarding these phenomenon, I believe that technology has advantages and drawbacks which I will mention below.
Video call was one of methods and there were more example such as social media, email, chatting platforms and others. These kind of methods made people across country could communicate in real-time and distance was no longer an obstacle like before this technology advancement was invented. My experience in communicating with counterpart abroad using Skype exemplified how technology has transformed this method in business environment radically. These benefits might decrease the cost of communication compare to the previous way of interacting.
Look at some details about what have happened to younger generation using technology, a new custom has established. They were keen on having interaction online with might be imaginary friends while real friends were ignored. Sometimes, I saw a couple youth in a cafe bringing their own gadget while smiling at the screen but they did not talk to each other. I suppose that it will isolate people from society. Technology advancement must bring people closer but separate people in the same table.
In conclusion, technology is a part of human life which bring many benefits, however, it is imperative to prevent the side-effect.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agriculture land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990s 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development? 56
- Comparison of hockey and soccer 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an alternative' or simply 'alternatives'?
Suggestion: an alternative; alternatives
... for example, video call is believed as an alternatives replacing direct face-to-face meeting. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this phenomenon' or 'these phenomena', 'these phenomenons'?
Suggestion: this phenomenon; these phenomena; these phenomenons
...than real-life communication. Regarding these phenomenon, I believe that technology has advantag...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
..., email, chatting platforms and others. These kind of methods made people across country c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 119, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[14]
Message: Did you mean 'side effect' (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.
Suggestion: side effect
...owever, it is imperative to prevent the side-effect.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, regarding, so, while, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 237.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64135021097 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04275877412 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.691983122363 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6779415 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.846153846 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2307692308 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222859379517 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711802491116 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426842733498 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116417594932 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425683677051 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.