Nowadays, the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?
These days, technology has revolutionized the way we communicate with each other. For example with internet and digital cellphones in every house, it is easier to contact with people all around the world, just by touch of a finger. I personally believe that this change in our lives has had both positive and negative impacts but overall I contend to consider it as a good occurrence.
Firstly, It is clear that nowadays people are tend to migrate from their home countries more than ever before. In the past, migration was a big and concerning change in a family with a member living in faraway places and they could hardly get in touch once in a while. Right now, Digital mobiles and gadgets, and a vast amount of applications such as skype, whatsapp and etc has ,facilitate for people to contact with their loved ones living abroad. Other than that technology has affected global trade in a serious and positive way. People with occupations all around the world can handle their businesses abroad easily in their office.
Secondly and more importantly, technology can cause misunderstanding among people especially in romantic relationships. Unfortunately, body languages and facial expressions are excluded from gadgets and may easily lead to arguments. Despite that, people who are occupied with technology to excess and spend too much time on the internet, may be in danger of social isolation and can lose their ability to communicate with real people.
By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that overall, technology has a positive impact on our lives. I think there should be an educational organs to teach people how to use advantageous from technology and avoid getting trapped into it.
- Nowadays, the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 78
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?What sort of punishment should parents and 78
- governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 29
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ions such as skype, whatsapp and etc has ,facilitate for people to contact with th...
^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... for people to contact with their loved ones living abroad. Other than that technolo...
^^^^
Line 7, column 157, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'organ'?
Suggestion: organ
... I think there should be an educational organs to teach people how to use advantageous...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07042253521 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83574682011 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616197183099 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5573873108 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.769230769 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278558296029 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998046745481 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641407668881 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168278611583 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480178688307 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.