Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?

Essay topics:

Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?

Amount of garbage produced by people is the biggest threat in today's world. People like to live a luxurious lifestyle and following the latest trends, buy updated products from the market. Central authority should take cautious steps to change the behaviour and habit of the society.
To begin with, myriad people today are addicted to the latest technological gadgets. A market is flooded with advanced features items, companies alluring people to buy their products through adverts and hoardings. Hence, many civilians replaced old items with a new one, as a result, old items threw it in the garbage. Another significant consequence is that manifold citizen does not much aware of the downside of the rubbish they produced. This is because they were not educated and live in underprivileged section. Therefore, they throw dry and green waste anywhere either polythene or kitchen waste. Thus, these are two major concern amount of waste soared in the past few decades.
To solve the mentioned problems, authorities should take practical and productive steps. Firstly, the government should impose heavy taxes on new upcoming gadgets. This does not only help to curb people buy new items but also assist to reduced waste. Additionally, the government ought to spread awareness among people about try to recycle as much as household items possible and remaining must be throw in a dustbin by the mode if social media, campaign and rallies.
To conclude, it can be inferred that although people produced more rubbish by take new items and not much aware about drawbacks of creating rubbish but if government encourage people to recycle products and spread awareness this issue can be solved to large extent.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-10 anhoanguyenquin 78 view
2019-12-10 anhoanguyenquin 84 view
2019-12-10 anhoanguyenquin 78 view
2019-11-07 dhnhung 56 view
2019-07-10 Biamsaul 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 638, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'amount' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'amounts'.
Suggestion: amounts
...aste. Thus, these are two major concern amount of waste soared in the past few decades...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, then, therefore, thus, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18050541516 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59103687548 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592057761733 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4612632349 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138026037994 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391766829976 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582045662547 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929547083951 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072421171342 0.056905535591 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.