Nowadays, young people admire sports stars though they often do not set a good example. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Well-known athletes are believed to have been making bad models of their young admirers. In my opinion, nobody, including sports stars, is perfect. However, they have certainly had a significant impact on both individuals and society for a variety of reasons, which are detailed here.
According to many people, sports stars have powerfully influenced their young fans through their behaviors. To begin with, thanks to their sporty bodies, they could somewhat encourage their teenage fans to follow an appropriate exercise regimen in order to get fit or maintain a healthy body in a healthy mind, like their idols. As a result, these young admirers could spend more time at gyms or doing home workouts instead of staying in their sedentary lifestyle. Moreover, sports stars could be a good model for building a healthy and scientific eating habit. For example, Lebron James is said to inspire young people to follow the same strict diet as him, which is thought to be one of the many great keys that led to him winning the champions' seasons.
It is worth noting that famous athletes have also had a great impact on society through their good deeds, aside from successful sports careers. Firstly, their charitable models could raise awareness of caring for poor children and people in need all around the world. For example, Michael Phelps has annually spent millions of dollars on charity and voluntary missions. Secondly, some international sports stars have gotten into scandals. However, people can even learn something moral from there. To illustrate, many steroids scandals in MLB (Major League Baseball) have put an end to many baseball players’ careers, which reminds people to build a clean career based on honesty and fair-play.
To sum up, although there are still some dark sides in the lives and careers of many sports stars, I believe it cannot be denied that they have inspired young fans to have a good dream of their own and also show a way to achieve it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-31 | Celina Pei | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-22 | Mai Clover | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-27 | giangngoc | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-06 | giangngoc | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-15 | Blackcytrus | 84 | view |
- The chart and table provide data about cars registered in one country over a period of time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some educationalists say that every child should be taught how to play a musical instrument To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use
- Traditions are about the past and innovation is about the future and it has been argued that we need to let go of traditions for the sake of progress To what extent do you agree or disagree with this What role should traditions have in our lives Give reas 89
- Over time as children grow older the relationship they have with their parents changes In your opinion what role should parents have in their adult children s lives Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98484848485 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43996605375 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1415955115 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142840011589 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507738547733 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323312361171 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086143095361 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275667119393 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.