Nowadays, young people are admiring media and sport celebrities , even though they do not set a good example. Do you think this is a positive or negative development ?
In this contemporary life, there are many technological devices and social media. Therefore, many young people admire the media and well-known people even though they are not good role models. This essay will examine the cause of that and examine both sides before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of young people admiring many celebrities but they are not good examples. From one standpoint, emulating famous entertainment companies could change the behavior and fashion among young adolescents who are not mature enough to understand which is suitable for society. This matters of that, the famous person show their energy and propensities for copying anything celebrities do in TV, social media that they watching, even if their actions go against with the value traditional of country. Regarding fashion, the way Dam Vinh Hung, a famous singer in Viet Nam, customized the traditional dress but it's a really unacceptable trend of fashion with exposed skin. Unfortunately, the young have yet to know and understand long-term shortcomings such as the trend of traditional ways of dressing which value the beauty and elegance of Ao Dai.
In addition, this trend could tempt many young people including those who are not academically inclined or show no interest in researching about the culture and traditional things of the country. Moreover, they can have some warnings and bad arguments on social media to protect their favorite persons and sometimes spread their negative vibes to everyone, thereby adding great burdens for government and social management and wasting time that these young people could spend on their career paths.
In conclusion, I suppose the phenomenon that young people idolize media and sport celebrated individuals who are notorious in some aspects is negative.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
Tue, 06/10/2025 - 14:22 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
Sat, 08/07/2021 - 12:18 | Komaldeep | 81 | view |
Fri, 07/16/2021 - 14:19 | Radioactive- | 78 | view |
Thu, 01/10/2019 - 23:35 | cuongthkl0202 | 83 | view |
Thu, 08/09/2018 - 13:05 | Longnguyen3001 | 72 | view |
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Some countries alluring old people to vocations to whatever age that they want This essay will examine both sides of argument before a reasoned conclusion is drawn 56
- The bar chart give information about people living in Australia and living outside Australia in urban rural and countryside from 1995 to 2010 67
- Some people think that history has nothing or little to tell us but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present 67
- Pollution and environment damage result from developing and making the country richer To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 647, Rule ID: IT_IS[11]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...m, customized the traditional dress but its a really unacceptable trend of fashion ...
^^^
Line 4, column 16, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...on their career paths. In conclusion, I suppose the phenomenon that young peopl...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, really, regarding, so, therefore, well, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37630662021 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75930910558 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588850174216 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.5087173826 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.272727273 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267486841405 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105857275147 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918846122366 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166173843716 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460176086971 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.