In this contemporary era, everyone has a desire to own a car which eventually leads to increased traffic, thus creating the need to build new road systems. Some people believe that this is the government's responsibility to spent money on it; however, other people reckon that the money should have to be taken from the car's owners. Personally, I believe that it's the government's responsibility to spend money on it as they are already taking taxes from the citizens.
As a matter of fact, traffic is rising day by day owing to an increase in ownership of cars. An increase in traffic is not only creating a need for new road systems but also increasing the maintenance of roads, thus more and more money is required. The government should spend money on it because they are already taking lots of taxes from the citizens. For a country, a proper road system is crucial for commuting from place to place and it is also necessary for making the country well developed.
However, due to over ownership of cars people are overusing their cars which nevertheless increasing the traffic and also creating need to make new road systems. The main reason for making new road systems are the users of cars, therefore, some people claim that its the responsibility to owner to pay the money for that. Sometimes people also own more than one car just to show off their success, yet it creates problems for the government to maintain the traffic.
To put it in a nutshell, it's the government's responsibility to maintain the traffic by creating new road systems from their budget, the government can take a small fraction of expenses required to build it from the users in terms of tax.
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the user should cover the costs Discuss both these views and give your opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...s. Some people believe that this is the governments responsibility to spent money on it; ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 360, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...cars owners. Personally, I believe that its the governments responsibility to spend...
^^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...cars, therefore, some people claim that its the responsibility to owner to pay the ...
^^^
Line 7, column 26, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...e traffic. To put it in a nutshell, its the governments responsibility to maint...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76712328767 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70272097974 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455479452055 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.0045910755 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.545454545 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5454545455 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281133922416 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121096668381 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729315032004 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180971714609 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575903482988 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 78.4519038076 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.