As the number of cars increases more money has to spend on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the user should cover the costs Discuss and give your opinion

Improved traffic infrastructure is a necessity for any community in order to improve commutation and logistics as well, Masses ponder that government should pay for this, while others think that the users should fund this instead, In my opinion private vehicle users should be bearing this cost.
There are several reasons I put forward to support my inclination, To begin with, Major part of the population depend upon the public transportation to commute on daily basis, and there are also many people who do not commute on daily basis, So it is not fair for them to contribute to the money spent on developing roads and traffic system. Furthermore, this can also encourage the people to use public transport, which is very beneficial to the atmosphere in numerous ways like, Using public transport will reduce air pollution by restraining the carbon mono oxide emission, when one vehicle used by many folks instead of using individual mode of transportation. Another Advantage of using public transportation is, when masses commute individually there will be exorbitant amount of traffic which will result in increased amount of traffic congestions on traffic signals and junctions.
On the flipside of the coin, private vehicle owners are charged with excessive amount of taxes while purchasing a new vehicle in the form of road tax, and charging additional taxes will be not be fair on behalf of the regime. Moreover, not every citizen who owns a private vehicle travels on daily basis, therefore the best solution for this problem is new electronic toll sensors should be introduced with comparatively high toll tax, and private vehicles should be charged a negligible amount for the distance they cover, this funds can add up to the government budget and ideally be allocated to develop roads and traffic infrastructure.
To conclude, private vehicles contribute a gigantic part of the total traffic on roads, therefore they should be charged toll on the basis of distance they cover instead of being charged for owning a vehicle.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14759036145 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8121031034 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527108433735 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 47.0 20.2975951904 232% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.1665656761 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 244.142857143 106.682146367 229% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 47.4285714286 20.7667163134 228% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 12.8571428571 7.06120827912 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195998772552 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959447101315 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105962404791 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140694528766 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114035831713 0.056905535591 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.5 13.0946893788 202% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 21.6 11.3001002004 191% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.48 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.0 9.78957915832 296% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 20.8 10.1190380762 206% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.