Major cities around the globe are connected by roads and fast railway lines due to increasing demand for advance transportation to develop and boost the economies. For better transport, it is considered by some that instead of spending huge amount of public funds in constructing new railway lines for modern trains between cities, government should focus on improving the existing public transport system. In modern world, the increasing demand for transport of goods and services for growing population necessitates the construction of fast train lines while improving and maintaining the existing road transportation system.
Building new railways lines are not only expensive but also time consuming. Government encourages these projects to facilitate population with the best possible transport system in order to connect cities with easy and fast access points for better communications and business transactions. China has constructed a network of railway lines for bullet train to minimizing the travelling time between its major cities. Not only are modern trains cheaper in long run, they are also convenient mode of commute to fight against climate change because of green energy consumption. Building such expensive structures need huge amount of finance which many countries cannot afford due to limited resources, however.
Instead of constructing new lines, government should focus on improving the exiting transport because it requires less amount of financial support in expanding and maintaining the roads. Having improved existing transport system, many developed nations have transformed their transport systems into modern advanced fast track systems. Maintained and improved properly, the existing road system can save a huge amount of money which government can allocate to important areas such as health and education. However, because of globalization and economic transnational demands, government should not only maintain and improve the existing transport system but also it is need of the hour to construct new fast train lines between cities.
Constructing new infrastructure requires funds which many countries are not privileged to support, while improving old transport can be helpful for short time outcomes and milestones. Because of growing population’s transportation demand, not only should government build railway lines but also should renovate the existing transport systems to ease access to markets for better economic progress.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 78
- Some people believe that it is good to share information as much as possible in scientific research, buisness and the acadamic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 73
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving the existing public transport. Discuss bo 73
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'encourages'.
Suggestion: encourages
...ive but also time consuming. Government encourage these projects to facilitate population...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'encourages'.
Suggestion: encourages
...ive but also time consuming. Government encourage these projects to facilitate population...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 356, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'minimizing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: minimizing
...twork of railway lines for bullet train to minimize the travelling time between its major c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2116.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79726027397 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9342887837 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498630136986 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.3128017231 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.142857143 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0714285714 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 7.06120827912 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327014185031 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132957175071 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934904979731 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223394257237 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736872636677 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.