The revolutionary advancements in field of science and technology endowed man with ability to share information globally by having access to internet. It is considered by some that by sharing information with humanity, future of world is enhanced, while other claims that information is too much valuable because it need finance for security and maintenance. Although sharing information is vital for growth and development in field of scientific research, business, and academics, it is risky to share secret information because of its sensitivity.
In era of internet many universities, businesses, and academic institutions are consistently improving to increase the availability of information for rapid growth and development. For this reason, many firms are now looking into open-source to enhance their collaboration for production. For instance, Microsoft has open-sourced their window 10 recently and has also purchased the Github to enhance the collaboration for supporting the open-source computer programming projects. Many university portals provide profiles and ongoing research information of professors to invite interested candidates globally under supervision to continue the research for industries.
Not only Information is the core assets of many businesses, but also it needs financial support for security and maintenance. Some scientific research information needs too much security and should not be allowed to be shared freely because of their sensitivity they can lead to chaos and terror. Shared openly, nuclear physics confidential research access for terror organizations will be leading to chaos and death of humanity.
In conclusion, although information sharing has great impact on growth and development, it is necessary to secure valuable and confidential information. Only if information is funded and filtered properly can we increase growth in research for better world.
- Some people believe that it is good to share information as much as possible in scientific research, buisness and the acadamic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 73
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving the existing public transport. Discuss bo 73
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.3376753507 300% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90494296578 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31195513667 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558935361217 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.572885479 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 129.416666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281969962134 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114488698719 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104173427241 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187210283518 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107099252194 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.