In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on the constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in a part of the society believing that it is imperative to use huge amount of money building new railway lines; whereas, others assert that the expenditure must be for the betterment of the existing transportation system. There are compelling arguments on both the sides of the contentious topic; on balance, however it is my firm conviction that new railways and transformation of existing transformation would devote for the betterment of a nation.
There are numerous arguments in the favor of assembling new rail ways; out of all the most preponderantly evident is that it is more spacious and cheap. This is to say- with the increase in the population, building new railways can be proved as bone because it ensures that a huge crowd travel at one go, as this mode is more capacious compared to the other transportations. Also, not all can afford traveling by airplane or cars, for the general public this mode is inexpensive and easily accessible. A salient example of this attribute is Metro lines in India. According to the recent survey conducted by eminent travel agency states that Metro has proved to be the most preferred option by the public and they demand for building new rail line. Hence, it will not be incorrect to infer that money should be invested in building new rail ways.
On the contrary, there is plethora of logical thoughts to support the view that spending money on the existing travel mode is wise, because by doing so a country will not only develop with better infrastructure but also can invest the saved amount for the other improvements such as education, which can help a country to groom overall. A longitudinal study conducted by the renowned researcher states that after money invested in the existing roads of Singapore proved to be suggestively intellectual decision, as the country could save the sum for more good causes. Therefore, infrastructure of a country ought to be better before building new roads.
To conclude, considering the differential views on the way money needs to be spent on transportation, my inclination is that both hold equal importance and are extensively essential for the developing country. But will this phenomenon be followed by most of the nations? Stays a question.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-24 | sonamsharma | 87 | view |
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different ages and culture together To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people can buy similar products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 87
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on the constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both 87
- Leaving in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... others assert that the expenditure must be for the betterment of the existing...
^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...assert that the expenditure must be for the betterment of the existing transpo...
^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...expenditure must be for the betterment of the existing transportation system. ...
^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nditure must be for the betterment of the existing transportation system. The...
^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in the population, building new railways can be proved as bone because it ensures...
^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to travel'.
Suggestion: to travel
...ansportations. Also, not all can afford traveling by airplane or cars, for the general pu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... traveling by airplane or cars, for the general public this mode is inexpensive and easily acc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 605, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...According to the recent survey conducted by eminent travel agency states that Met...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, whereas, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1950.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02577319588 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98692548976 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505154639175 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.0472372076 49.4020404114 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.285714286 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279659540018 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895526197746 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546719289009 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166741639639 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331725457997 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.