In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Countries are investing a huge amount of money to improve infrastructure. Few people assume that countries should invest its resources for constructing of new railway lines for fast trains while others assume that money should be invested in improving existing public transport. This essay will discuss why investing in existing public transport has its sides benefits but why constructing new railway lines for fast trains are more beneficial.
Utilizing funds for the construction of the new railway routes is certainly an efficient way to increase mobility and improve transport routes. If new railway lines are constructed, mobility of people and goods would efficiently be completed. In addition, the new routes of railway lines would enable us to reach an inaccessible area of the country. For example, it takes 40 minutes to reach Delhi from Mumbai. Thus, if funds are invested in the construction of the railway routes there will be an increase in mobility and new routes will be constructed.
However, funds can be also invested to improve existing public transport to make it convenient and affordable. If a country public transport system are upgraded then passengers are able to travel more comfortable. Indeed, it will also be affordable to travel for lower-income people. For example, Kathmandu has one of the cheapest bus fares in the world. Thus, if we improve the existing public transport system, passengers can travel conveniently and cheaply.
To conclude, countries are upgrading their infrastructure by investing huge funds. This essay discussed few people assumption on investing funds for the construction of new railway routes between cities while others assumption to utilize funds for upgrading existing public transport. In my opinion, countries should invest their funds for the construction of the railway routes connecting cities so, it will increase mobility and accessibility.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- The bar graph represents the consumption of fruits and vegetables by men women and children in Britain from 2001 to 2008 67
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 67
- The following line graph shows the three different reasons of weight exports from 1985 to 1990 73
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organisation Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t to make it convenient and affordable. If a country public transport system are u...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...increase mobility and accessibility.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, thus, while, for example, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51013513514 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97229530053 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.439189189189 0.561755894193 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6727248301 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.9375 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374162971657 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134907361604 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966480238579 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244682524766 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102174093842 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.