In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Throughout the last decades, there have been conflicting opinions on transportation infrastructure. A number of people assume that investment on high-speed railway construction costs a fortune whereas the opponents advocate that the government should consider the idea of developing current public transport. My essay will clarify both sides of the issue and express my own point of view.
On one hand, the construction of high-speed railway lines will bring about a great income for our country, that is due to the fact that humans easily get attracted by what is new or unfamiliar to them. For example, as a high-speed train was installed in Vietnam, a considerable number of people, mostly youngsters, arrive on train in order to satisfy their needs of experience. Moreover, with a first look at the cutting edge transportation system, a remarkable impression is made in the deep memory of visitors. It is common knowledge that this significantly increases foreign relationships with other nations.
On the other hand, investment on current public transport, in many ways, benefits the inhabitants. First of all, fewer people are at risk of being late for work because of transport deficiency, which can indirectly terribly influence the local economy. Assuming that the idea of a bus with more space, or more public transportations is carried out, people, especially those distant from their work or schools, will arrive on time. What is more, as existing public vehicles are developed, the national budget comes on by leaps and bounds. For example, the amount of money from bus fare will be put into a budget that is later spent on renovating local infrastructure.
For the reasons above, it seems to me that investment should be made on renovating rather than research on new type of transportation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-26 | just_minhh | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-19 | Cicihg | 73 | view |
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these v 78
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plan for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssue and express my own point of view. On one hand, the construction of high-sp...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eign relationships with other nations. On the other hand, investment on current...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 597, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he amount of money from bus fare will be put into a budget that is later spent on...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t on renovating local infrastructure. For the reasons above, it seems to me th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, moreover, so, whereas, for example, first of all, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20205479452 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06554675996 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595890410959 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.499105111 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.846153846 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228249502054 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693973577301 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388550245646 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122977551971 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205122912073 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.