In a number of countries, spme people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing nw railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Recently, there is controversy what the government should invest in either fast trains or other public transportation. Some people assume that the government should construct high speed railways for saving time. However, others argue that the government should invest to improve public transports which are use by many people. In this essay, I will discuss both these views and present my opinion.
On the one hand, people who want to save time wish to develop high speed trains. First, many people think that time is very important like the gold, because no one can buy time with money. As a result, passengers who use high-speed trains are increasing. However, there are not enough fast railways systems which are satified with customers' need. For example, according to Korean article, many korean people want to use high-speed trains known as Korea train express (KTX) for saving time. However, high-speed railway lines are not enough to go to all parts of the country. Consequently, they replace to get on a plane. Therefore, they need to build new high-speed railway lines for economy of time.
On the other hand, others argue that they want to develop existing public transport while they do not need high-speed trains. There are several reasons why they do not like to invest fast railway systems. First, high-speed trains charge for passengers big fares. For example, KTX charges a big fare as compared with other public transportation. As a result, many people take other ways to earn time. Next, present public transportation needs less investment to develop than making new high-speed railway systems. In order to build new high-speed railway lines, they need many things such as money, time, workers and space. However, developing existing public transportaion needs a small effort. For instance, in Korea, every bus was packed during the rush hours. However, the government increased public buses to solve this problem instead of building high-speed trains. As a result the problem was fixed while cost was cheaper than building new trains. Therefore, improving existing public transportation is more easier and cheaper than building new high-speed railway systems.
To sum up, as I mentioned above, although we live in a world where time is valuable like gold, improving existing public transportations is likely to have benefits. Therefore, governments should consider for people's need to spend money whether existing public transportation or high-speed trains.
- In a number of countries, spme people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing nw railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both the 56
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do tou agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreigh language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you aggree or disagree with this statement? 61
- The two maps below show road acces to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 84
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them more happy.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 872, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... instead of building high-speed trains. As a result the problem was fixed while co...
^^
Line 5, column 1010, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...oving existing public transportation is more easier and cheaper than building new high-spee...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2090.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 394.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30456852792 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6953597742 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482233502538 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6073189625 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.3846153846 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1538461538 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11538461538 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 3.4128256513 440% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244795677415 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795652998841 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521261674121 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18687839818 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425117311381 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.