The numbers of cars keeps increasing. So road should be expand some people think the government should pay of it, while other think the car owners should pay for it. Discuss both this views and give your opinion.
In this contemporary era, due to advancement of technology people use various kind of vehicles on road which has been escalated day-to-day. Some folk believe that government has to pay expenditure on roads for widening it; whereas, others reckon that it is responsibility of car buyers to lavishing for roads. I would like to discuss both these views in trail paragraphs before coming to plausible conclusion.
To commence with, the predominant factor which cannot be ignored is about environment because drivers who buy the cars have to pay tax but there are some families who are unable to pay tax more often. As a result, citizens are trying to buy less vehicles and there will be decrease in pollution which emits harmful gases in the air from vehicles and adverse effects on the surrounding will be ameliorated. Moreover, if car buyers will take the responsibility of road spread. Thus, people use communal carpooling. To illustrate, according to the recent survey conducted by the Times Of India in which they concluded that in a year 2017 the ratio of private vehicles had been decreased by 27% because of communal carpooling.
However, another pivotal facet of this argument is broden the road is onus of government. Since, public health pay tax on toll plaza which is obvious that government give big roads facilities to them. Furthermore, administration have much ideas about planning road compare to citizen and also government can use modern technology for large scale projects in order to improve road length through which public get help. Last but not the least, people can get out of burden when government take these responsibilities from them and spend money on roads as they wish.
In conclusion, it is inferred that, despite of expanding the roads by private vehicles owner in order to ameliorate issues of environmental, communal carpooling. I firmly agree that government should do it for generation tax, new technology, less burden life which is logically accepted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-12 | Manan patel | 76 | view |
- The graph below show the comparison of age structure in India and France in 1982
- Below graph show comparison of age structure in India and France in 1984 84
- The below graph compare the age structure of India and France in 1984 84
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The numbers of cars keeps increasing So road should be expand some people think the government should pay of it while other think the car owners should pay for it Discuss both this views and give your opinion 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun vehicles is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...As a result, citizens are trying to buy less vehicles and there will be decrease in ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t survey conducted by the Times Of India in which they concluded that in a year 2...
^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... broden the road is onus of government. Since, public health pay tax on toll plaza wh...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... them. Furthermore, administration have much ideas about planning road compare to ci...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas, as to, in conclusion, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12576687117 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89404945105 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58282208589 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0302258567 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.357142857 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243838943722 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773406992529 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496728769886 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142772476353 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392138088424 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.