The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live think and behave However some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life To what extent do you agree or disagree w

The Advent of 21st century has brought numerous transformations in this world that were unimagined also five decades ago. In these days people's way of thinking has changed completely. Due to this, it is stated that life teaching methods of elders are unusual for younger children because of being much older. I contradict this statement owing to have some indispensable reasons behind it. These both sides will be explained in upcoming paragraphs before writing the conclusion.
To commence with, a group of people argue that those ways, which were used to teach basic skills in terms of way of living, thinking as well as behaving to someone, doesn't work on children in these days. Due to having much backward vibes, these rules are unusual for today's generation. As well as, it is considered that children are much educated and they are much relied on books instead of learning traditional ways of surviving. Youth priorities the knowledge, which they grab from books. Because, they think it teaches them to live time accordingly. Whereas, traditional ideas hard to implement in this pace of life because of being older.
To contradict, as it is considered that parents are first teacher of their child. Therefore, I opine that customatic ideas should be taught to youth for making culture secure. In this globalised world, youngsters are not only learning multicultural ways of living but also they are being attracted towards other cultures. Due to this, they are losing their cultural manners of living,wearing and behaving, which are separated in every society. For making it safer, elder should teach basic manners to their offsprings. Although, book study should be taken to make professional life successful. Whereas, traditional education is essential for happy personal life.
In conclusion, although, It is true that customatic ideas of living are so older and hard to implement in today's life. But, for making cultures secure and living happy personal life still based on these views.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 166, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...hinking as well as behaving to someone, doesnt work on children in these days. Due to ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 493, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... knowledge, which they grab from books. Because, they think it teaches them to live tim...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , wearing
... losing their cultural manners of living,wearing and behaving, which are separated in ev...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...each basic manners to their offsprings. Although, book study should be taken to make pro...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, so, still, therefore, well, whereas, in conclusion, as well as, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17592592593 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71880296726 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564814814815 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4159215608 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.85 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203918732337 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636750439876 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473575294067 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133900285107 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233075798024 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.