One way to solve the problem of congestion on the roads is to increase the tax on private vehicles. How could this alleviate congestion? What other measures can you suggest to deal with congestion in cities?
The traffic snarl-up is a cause of widespread concern today, as many commuters have been struggling with. Tax hike on private transport may shoulder the financial burden of vehicle ownership, leading reducing traffic levels and congestion. In addition, there are various solutions that may also combat traffic density, particularly in metropolitan cities. The following essay will support my opinion with additional information.
Imposing the higher tax on individual transport owners from the government may affect considerably on volume of transport. For instance, the exorbitant cost of purchasing and maintenance expenses for a private transport may motive a significant shift in demand for more affordable options such as sustainable transport. Furthermore, Public infrastructure capacity should accommodate sufficiently for a rapidly growing population that may support this proposal to a large extent.
Additionally, there is probably the most another advantageous solution that is to offer tax incentives for individuals' public transport expenses. Popular in the US has gained support from the policy marker which overlooks the overwhelming triple bottom line benefits associated with public transport use and reduced urban congestion. Limiting the number of vehicles possessed each household is the solution for this phenomenon. For example, Singapore is to cap personal transport on its streets and harder for approval from the state to buy new cars. Finally, ride-hailing or car-pool services like Grab application and so on, have been utilized widely across the world. Not only could these platforms support to ease the volume of transport as well as traffic problems, but they also create more job opportunities among citizens.
In conclusion, I believe that should incorporate tax increase and other measures such benefit tax policy, vehicles limitation and technology application into dealing with traffic jam problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-19 | Koshal singh | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-30 | lily2002 | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-30 | lily2002 | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-22 | annatran12324 | 84 | view |
| 2019-01-22 | annatran12324 | 11 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and overbetween 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 78
- writing task 1 The pie charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 84
- the chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The table below gives information about the underground railwaysystems in six cities. 78
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, if, look, may, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82456140351 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05023903014 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652631578947 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1987850738 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.571428571 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0879576620726 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316214143953 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042308760789 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0728389667096 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604461902238 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.