online classes make conventional classrooms unnecessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Virtual learning is a phenomenal model of education due to the popularity of the internet and modern devices. Subsequently, many people assert that conventional classes are no longer vital. My perspective is completely contrary to the statement and I am going to demonstrate my reasons reinforce for it.
On the one hand, physical interaction among students and teachers or lectures is the chief essential element provided by conventional schools which online courses lack of. Comprehending lessons and knowledge in person augment the quality of education as students can have their questions responded instantly. Presentations in metal space help teacher easily stimulate the studying passions inside students and formulate an enthusiastic learning atmosphere. Meanwhile., learning confront a flat screen seems not to be attractive. Furthermore, people attending offline classes stand a chance to prone their social skills such as leadership, teamwork and communication skills, as a result, froster community relationships.
On the other hand, campus-based classes are attached with necessary academic-related facilities, supporting research and experiment purposes in some typical subjects and course. With this superior advantage, traditional schooling's students are capable of honing practical skills apart from just theory. For instance, online leaners attending biology or chemistry classes , with no availability of laboratory, could not conduct any experiments in order to apply the lessions into reality.Despite the undeniable growth of the internet, numerous specific classes, especially tertiary education of engineer, obligatorily take place directly. As is evident, online schooling method limits connections and practibility, leading to the fall in education progress.
In conclusion, I believe that traditional form of school is expendable no matter how developed and convenient the online model might become.
- in spite if the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is the case What can be dine about this 56
- some students prefer to take a gap year between high school and university to work or to travel Do the disadvantages outweigh the advanatges 84
- To learn a language well we should learn about the country as well as the cultures and their lifestyle Agree or not 56
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- there are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 457, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...te an enthusiastic learning atmosphere. Meanwhile., learning confront a flat screen seems...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 478, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to confront'
Suggestion: to confront
...arning atmosphere. Meanwhile., learning confront a flat screen seems not to be attractiv...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s attending biology or chemistry classes , with no availability of laboratory, cou...
^^
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Despite
...rder to apply the lessions into reality.Despite the undeniable growth of the internet, ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, thus, while, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.05860805861 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27896503491 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.695970695971 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7505308018 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.230769231 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0914669094327 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296115081476 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03287095708 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0513999889018 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00858114805452 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.87 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.33 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.