Organized tours to remote community and other countries are increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for local people and the local environment.
It is true that expeditions to remote areas and other regions are now becoming more and more common. From my personal point of view, this trend towards travelling is an overall downward development and it could have some serious impacts on the local residents and the local environment.
To begin with, an issue of arranged trips to other countries and regions is that it could possibly change the living habits of the indigenous. Normally in most faraway places and regions, local people develop their own unique customs and traditions as well as lifestyles. Due to the increasing amount of tourists visiting, some regions are confronted by the problem that their cultural and traditional values might be damaged. For example, Phuquoc, a small island with long beautiful beaches located to the South of Vietnam, has witnessed profound changes into a place for resorts and hotels in just 5 years since its beauty was discovered. It has become the place for lucrative businesses, but it also changed they way the local residents live as people give up their traditional fishing, which was passed down through generations, to work in tourism service industry.
Moreover, the local environment could be suffered from irreversible damage caused by organized tourism. Forests and rivers home to many wild animals and aquatic creatures are being contaminated by indiscriminate littering caused by hordes of visitors. Besides that, in many distant places, trees are being chopped down to make way for roads and constructions to cater to the need of travelling and camping. This consequently ruins the local ecosystem.
In conclusion, the popularity of arranged tours to distant areas and other countries adversely effect both the local people and the local environment in the way that it changes how the people live and pollute the regions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-12 | mary.ssherr | 67 | view |
| 2018-10-10 | conmatot | 84 | view |
| 2018-07-21 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine Government funding should reflect this To what extent do you agree 79
- Task 2: Marketing and promotion is a key to a successful business. To what extent do you agree? 78
- In many countries people tend to move overseas or move to a different part of their country after their retirement Discuss why they do so and what the outcome of this situation is Provide specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 87
- an increase number of people buying what they need onlinewhat are the advantages and disadvantages for both individuals and companies to shopping online 67
- Task 2: large businesses have big budget for marketing and promotion and as a result, people gravitate towards buying their products.what problem does this cause?what could be done to encourage people to buy local products. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ged trips to other countries and regions is that it could possibly change the liv...
^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...other countries and regions is that it could possibly change the living habits of the indigen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al values might be damaged. For example, Phuquoc, a small island with long beauti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, if, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23310810811 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75630751175 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597972972973 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3834022695 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.083333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310625937173 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997766413115 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791218667273 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18842454173 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750028829377 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.